rates-beater.com vs smmresellerpanel.net
Two SMM panels side by side, on the figures we measure — age from the registries, the public price list, the order counter, reviews on named platforms — not on what either says about itself. Updated October 24, 2026.
| 2 panels |
49/ 100 · Fair
|
49/ 100 · Fair
|
|---|---|---|
| Online since | 2019 | 2017 |
| Engine | Perfect Panel | Perfect Panel |
| Services listed | 894 | 5,437 |
| Lowest price | $0.0009 per 1,000 | $0.01 per 1,000 |
| Order counter | not shown | not shown |
| Growth, 30 days | — | — |
| User rating | no reviews read | 3.5 of 5 · 1 reviews |
| Review platforms | — | Trustpilot |
| Owner | unclaimed | unclaimed |
| Reseller API | yes · /api/v2 | yes · /api/v2 |
| Status | online | online |
Prices on shared services
The lowest public rate per 1,000 on services at least two of these panels sell. The cheapest is not always the fastest: refill and drop are on each listing.
Cheapest across 12 rows: smmresellerpanel.net 9 · rates-beater.com 3
| Service |  rates-beater.com |  smmresellerpanel.net |
|---|---|---|
| Instagram followers | $0.75 | $0.42 |
| Instagram likes | $0.09 | $0.11 |
| Instagram views | $0.0029 | $0.01 |
| Instagram comments | $2.31 | $0.36 |
| TikTok followers | $1.59 | $0.80 |
| TikTok likes | $0.18 | $0.09 |
| TikTok views | $0.0009 | $0.01 |
| TikTok comments | $8.40 | $1.20 |
| TikTok shares | $0.17 | $0.03 |
| YouTube likes | $0.75 | $0.24 |
| YouTube views | $0.48 | $0.28 |
| YouTube subscribers | $13.75 | $7.20 |
| YouTube shares | $0.63 | $0.18 |
| Telegram likes | $0.02 | $0.02 |
| Telegram views | $0.0036 | $0.01 |
| Telegram members | $0.15 | $0.03 |
| Facebook followers | $0.69 | $0.18 |
| Facebook likes | $0.72 | $0.12 |
| Facebook views | $0.09 | $0.01 |
| Facebook members | $1.50 | $0.26 |
| Twitter / X followers | $2.20 | $0.82 |
| Twitter / X likes | $0.48 | $0.40 |
| Twitter / X views | $0.005 | $0.01 |
| Spotify views | $0.23 | $0.17 |
| Twitch views | $14.88 | $0.68 |
Other comparisons
The nearest panels on the Trust Score to each side, online today.
rates-beater.com against…
rates-beater.com vs smmresellerpanel.net: questions and answers
Answers about rates-beater.com vs smmresellerpanel.net from what we measured: the order counter, the price list, the registries and the review platforms. Facts last read October 24, 2026.
rates-beater.com and smmresellerpanel.net both score 49 of 100 on the Trust Score. smmresellerpanel.net is the older of the two, online since 2017; rates-beater.com since 2019. rates-beater.com lists 894 services from $0.0009 per 1,000, smmresellerpanel.net 5,437 from $0.01. On the 8 services both sell, smmresellerpanel.net is cheaper on 5. smmresellerpanel.net is rated 3.5 of 5 across 1 reviews on the platforms we read; we found no reviews of rates-beater.com there. Of the 4 measures compared, smmresellerpanel.net leads 4. Whichever you choose, start with a small order.
Comparing the lowest public rate per 1,000 on the services both sell — Instagram followers: $0.75 on rates-beater.com against $0.42 on smmresellerpanel.net; Instagram likes: $0.09 on rates-beater.com against $0.11 on smmresellerpanel.net; Instagram views: $0.0029 on rates-beater.com against $0.01 on smmresellerpanel.net; Instagram comments: $2.31 on rates-beater.com against $0.36 on smmresellerpanel.net. smmresellerpanel.net is cheaper on 5 of the 8; the cheapest offer on any service is not always the fastest or the most stable, so check refill and drop on each listing.
rates-beater.com since 2019, no public counter; smmresellerpanel.net since 2017, no public counter. Age comes from the registry record or the web archive and counts towards the Trust Score; a counter that keeps moving counts more than a large frozen one.
rates-beater.com: unclaimed, no reviews read, Trust Score 49. smmresellerpanel.net: unclaimed, rated 3.5 across 1 reviews, Trust Score 49. smmresellerpanel.net has the stronger evidence behind it, and neither figure is a guarantee: start with a small order, check the delivery, and read the reviews behind each rating on the listing.