paytosmm.com vs rates-beater.com
Two SMM panels side by side, on the figures we measure — age from the registries, the public price list, the order counter, reviews on named platforms — not on what either says about itself. Updated September 21, 2026.
| 2 panels |
49/ 100 · Fair
|
49/ 100 · Fair
|
|---|---|---|
| Online since | 2018 | 2019 |
| Engine | Perfect Panel | Perfect Panel |
| Services listed | 2,285 | 872 |
| Lowest price | $0.001 per 1,000 | $0.0009 per 1,000 |
| Order counter | not shown | not shown |
| Growth, 30 days | — | — |
| User rating | 2.5 of 5 · 5 reviews | no reviews read |
| Review platforms | Trustpilot | — |
| Owner | unclaimed | unclaimed |
| Reseller API | yes · /api/v2 | yes · /api/v2 |
| Status | online | online |
Prices on shared services
The lowest public rate per 1,000 on services at least two of these panels sell. Cheapest is not always fastest — refill and drop stand on each listing.
Cheapest across 12 rows: paytosmm.com 9 · rates-beater.com 3
| Service |  paytosmm.com |  rates-beater.com |
|---|---|---|
| Instagram followers | $0.501 | $0.42 |
| Instagram likes | $0.037 | $0.044 |
| Instagram views | $0.001 | $0.0019 |
| Instagram comments | $0.555 | $2.31 |
| Instagram shares | $0.002 | $0.12 |
| TikTok followers | $0.968 | $1.72 |
| TikTok likes | $0.047 | $0.18 |
| TikTok views | $0.01 | $0.0009 |
| TikTok comments | $0.36 | $7.20 |
| TikTok shares | $0.019 | $0.10 |
| YouTube likes | $0.811 | $0.75 |
| YouTube views | $0.265 | $0.48 |
| YouTube subscribers | $0.50 | $13.75 |
| Telegram likes | $0.118 | $0.02 |
| Telegram views | $0.002 | $0.0036 |
| Telegram members | $0.01 | $0.14 |
| Telegram comments | $1.76 | $2.04 |
| Telegram shares | $0.039 | $0.03 |
| Facebook followers | $0.158 | $0.69 |
| Facebook likes | $0.125 | $0.72 |
| Facebook views | $0.107 | $0.09 |
| Facebook members | $0.347 | $1.50 |
| Twitter / X followers | $0.75 | $2.20 |
| Twitter / X likes | $0.75 | $0.48 |
| Twitter / X views | $0.002 | $0.005 |
| Twitter / X shares | $4.90 | $0.90 |
| Spotify followers | $0.50 | $0.25 |
| Spotify views | $0.09 | $0.23 |
Other comparisons
The nearest panels on the Trust Score to each side, online today.
paytosmm.com against…
paytosmm.com vs rates-beater.com: questions and answers
Straight answers about paytosmm.com vs rates-beater.com, built from what we measured — the counter, the price list, the registries and the review platforms. Facts last read September 21, 2026.
paytosmm.com and rates-beater.com both score 49 of 100 on the Trust Score. paytosmm.com is the older of the two, online since 2018; rates-beater.com since 2019. paytosmm.com lists 2,285 services from $0.001 per 1,000, rates-beater.com 872 from $0.0009. On the 8 services both sell, paytosmm.com is cheaper on 6. paytosmm.com is rated 2.5 of 5 across 5 reviews on the platforms we read; we found no reviews of rates-beater.com there. Of the 4 measures compared, paytosmm.com leads 4. Whichever you choose, start with a small order.
Comparing the lowest public rate per 1,000 on the services both sell — Instagram followers: $0.501 on paytosmm.com against $0.42 on rates-beater.com; Instagram likes: $0.037 on paytosmm.com against $0.044 on rates-beater.com; Instagram views: $0.001 on paytosmm.com against $0.0019 on rates-beater.com; Instagram comments: $0.555 on paytosmm.com against $2.31 on rates-beater.com. paytosmm.com is cheaper on 6 of the 8; the cheapest offer on any service is not always the fastest or the most stable, so check refill and drop on each listing.
paytosmm.com since 2018, no public counter; rates-beater.com since 2019, no public counter. Age comes from the registry record or the web archive and counts towards the Trust Score; a counter that keeps moving counts more than a large frozen one.
paytosmm.com: unclaimed, rated 2.5 across 5 reviews, Trust Score 49. rates-beater.com: unclaimed, no reviews read, Trust Score 49. paytosmm.com has the stronger evidence behind it, and neither figure is a guarantee: start with a small order, check the delivery, and read the reviews behind each rating on the listing.