digitallov.com vs smmrug.com
Two SMM panels side by side, on the figures we measure — age from the registries, the public price list, the order counter, reviews on named platforms — not on what either says about itself. Updated November 2, 2026.
| 2 panels |
39/ 100 · Guarded
|
39/ 100 · Guarded
|
|---|---|---|
| Online since | 2023 | 2025 |
| Engine | Perfect Panel | Perfect Panel |
| Services listed | 681 | 6,123 |
| Lowest price | $0.001 per 1,000 | $0.001 per 1,000 |
| Order counter | 585,068 orders | 161,719 orders |
| Growth, 30 days | about 390 a day (+11,687 over 30 days) | no growth read |
| User rating | no reviews read | no reviews read |
| Review platforms | — | — |
| Owner | unclaimed | unclaimed |
| Reseller API | yes · /api/v2 | yes · /api/v2 |
| Status | online | online |
Prices on shared services
The lowest public rate per 1,000 on services at least two of these panels sell. The cheapest is not always the fastest: refill and drop are on each listing.
Cheapest across 12 rows: smmrug.com 8 · digitallov.com 4
| Service | ||
|---|---|---|
| Instagram followers | $1.21 | $0.48 |
| Instagram likes | $0.145 | $0.059 |
| Instagram views | $0.0014 | $0.0012 |
| Instagram members | $2.85 | $1.26 |
| Instagram comments | $0.716 | $0.76 |
| Instagram shares | $0.001 | $0.0014 |
| TikTok followers | $2.61 | $1.16 |
| TikTok likes | $0.801 | $0.025 |
| TikTok views | $0.007 | $0.0045 |
| YouTube likes | $0.03 | $0.293 |
| YouTube views | $0.294 | $0.26 |
| YouTube subscribers | $0.016 | $0.017 |
| YouTube comments | $2.02 | $2.10 |
| Telegram views | $0.0035 | $0.003 |
| Telegram members | $0.365 | $0.024 |
| Facebook followers | $0.308 | $0.196 |
| Facebook likes | $0.243 | $0.132 |
| Facebook views | $0.056 | $0.041 |
| Facebook members | $1.36 | $0.40 |
| Facebook comments | $0.401 | $2.55 |
| Twitter / X views | $0.0013 | $0.001 |
| LinkedIn followers | $17.22 | $11.00 |
| LinkedIn likes | $19.37 | $17.60 |
| Kwai followers | $1.09 | $0.645 |
| Kick followers | $2.13 | $0.24 |
| Kwai likes | $0.51 | $0.602 |
| Audiomack views | $0.748 | $0.04 |
| WhatsApp members | $0.381 | $0.40 |
Other comparisons
The nearest panels on the Trust Score to each side, online today.
digitallov.com vs smmrug.com: questions and answers
Answers about digitallov.com vs smmrug.com from what we measured: the order counter, the price list, the registries and the review platforms. Facts last read November 2, 2026.
digitallov.com and smmrug.com both score 39 of 100 on the Trust Score. digitallov.com is the older of the two, online since 2023; smmrug.com since 2025. digitallov.com lists 681 services from $0.001 per 1,000, smmrug.com 6,123 from $0.001. On the 8 services both sell, smmrug.com is cheaper on 6. digitallov.com's public counter stands at 585K orders (about 390 a day (+11,687 over 30 days)), smmrug.com's at 162K. Neither has reviews on the platforms we read. Of the 5 measures compared, digitallov.com leads 3 and smmrug.com 2. Whichever you choose, start with a small order.
Comparing the lowest public rate per 1,000 on the services both sell — Instagram followers: $1.21 on digitallov.com against $0.48 on smmrug.com; Instagram likes: $0.145 on digitallov.com against $0.059 on smmrug.com; Instagram views: $0.0014 on digitallov.com against $0.0012 on smmrug.com; Instagram members: $2.85 on digitallov.com against $1.26 on smmrug.com. smmrug.com is cheaper on 6 of the 8; the cheapest offer on any service is not always the fastest or the most stable, so check refill and drop on each listing.
digitallov.com since 2023, 585K orders on its counter; smmrug.com since 2025, 162K orders on its counter. Age comes from the registry record or the web archive and counts towards the Trust Score; a counter that keeps moving counts more than a large frozen one.
digitallov.com: unclaimed, no reviews read, Trust Score 39. smmrug.com: unclaimed, no reviews read, Trust Score 39. digitallov.com has the stronger evidence behind it, and neither figure is a guarantee: start with a small order, check the delivery, and read the reviews behind each rating on the listing.