digitallov.com vs xfollowr.com
Two SMM panels side by side, on the figures we measure — age from the registries, the public price list, the order counter, reviews on named platforms — not on what either says about itself. Updated October 24, 2026.
| 2 panels |
39/ 100 · Guarded
|
39/ 100 · Guarded
|
|---|---|---|
| Online since | 2023 | 2023 |
| Engine | Perfect Panel | Perfect Panel |
| Services listed | 702 | 773 |
| Lowest price | $0.0009 per 1,000 | $0.0013 per 1,000 |
| Order counter | 581,507 orders | not shown |
| Growth, 30 days | about 383 a day (+11,501 over 30 days) | — |
| User rating | no reviews read | 3.5 of 5 · 1 reviews |
| Review platforms | — | Trustpilot |
| Owner | unclaimed | unclaimed |
| Reseller API | yes · /api/v2 | yes · /api/v2 |
| Status | online | online |
Prices on shared services
The lowest public rate per 1,000 on services at least two of these panels sell. The cheapest is not always the fastest: refill and drop are on each listing.
Cheapest across 12 rows: xfollowr.com 7 · digitallov.com 5
| Service | ||
|---|---|---|
| Instagram followers | $0.459 | $0.435 |
| Instagram likes | $0.0048 | $0.122 |
| Instagram views | $0.0009 | $0.0013 |
| Instagram comments | $0.716 | $0.622 |
| Instagram shares | $0.001 | $0.576 |
| TikTok followers | $2.61 | $0.859 |
| TikTok likes | $0.42 | $0.165 |
| TikTok views | $0.007 | $0.0097 |
| YouTube likes | $0.30 | $0.172 |
| YouTube views | $0.472 | $0.247 |
| YouTube subscribers | $0.016 | $0.028 |
| YouTube comments | $2.02 | $1.36 |
| Telegram views | $0.0035 | $0.0051 |
| Telegram members | $0.365 | $0.412 |
| Facebook followers | $0.548 | $0.05 |
| Facebook likes | $0.243 | $0.344 |
| Facebook views | $0.056 | $0.021 |
| Facebook members | $1.36 | $0.344 |
| Facebook comments | $0.401 | $2.56 |
| Twitter / X views | $0.0013 | $0.0014 |
| Spotify followers | $0.406 | $0.327 |
| LinkedIn likes | $19.37 | $3.66 |
| Kwai followers | $1.09 | $0.59 |
| Kick followers | $2.13 | $4.22 |
| Kwai likes | $0.51 | $0.261 |
| Kwai views | $0.514 | $0.322 |
| WhatsApp members | $0.381 | $0.274 |
| Kwai comments | $35.57 | $3.67 |
Other comparisons
The nearest panels on the Trust Score to each side, online today.
digitallov.com vs xfollowr.com: questions and answers
Answers about digitallov.com vs xfollowr.com from what we measured: the order counter, the price list, the registries and the review platforms. Facts last read October 24, 2026.
digitallov.com and xfollowr.com both score 39 of 100 on the Trust Score. Both have been online since 2023. digitallov.com lists 702 services from $0.0009 per 1,000, xfollowr.com 773 from $0.0013. On the 8 services both sell, neither is cheaper overall. digitallov.com shows a public counter — 582K orders, about 383 a day (+11,501 over 30 days) — while xfollowr.com shows none. xfollowr.com is rated 3.5 of 5 across 1 reviews on the platforms we read; we found no reviews of digitallov.com there. The measures split evenly between the two — try a small order on each and compare the delivery.
Comparing the lowest public rate per 1,000 on the services both sell — Instagram followers: $0.459 on digitallov.com against $0.435 on xfollowr.com; Instagram likes: $0.0048 on digitallov.com against $0.122 on xfollowr.com; Instagram views: $0.0009 on digitallov.com against $0.0013 on xfollowr.com; Instagram comments: $0.716 on digitallov.com against $0.622 on xfollowr.com. Neither is cheaper overall; the cheapest offer on any service is not always the fastest or the most stable, so check refill and drop on each listing.
digitallov.com since 2023, 582K orders on its counter; xfollowr.com since 2023, no public counter. Age comes from the registry record or the web archive and counts towards the Trust Score; a counter that keeps moving counts more than a large frozen one.
digitallov.com: unclaimed, no reviews read, Trust Score 39. xfollowr.com: unclaimed, rated 3.5 across 1 reviews, Trust Score 39. The evidence is even, and neither figure is a guarantee: start with a small order, check the delivery, and read the reviews behind each rating on the listing.