socialmediaservices.shop vs zeeeedha.com
Two SMM panels side by side, on the figures we measure — age from the registries, the public price list, the order counter, reviews on named platforms — not on what either says about itself. Updated November 4, 2026.
| 2 panels |
49/ 100 · Fair
|
49/ 100 · Fair
|
|---|---|---|
| Online since | 2019 | 2014 |
| Engine | Perfect Panel | Perfect Panel |
| Services listed | 4,799 | 209 |
| Lowest price | $1.01 per 1,000 | $0.0052 per 1,000 |
| Order counter | 10,555 orders | not shown |
| Growth, 30 days | about 610 a day (+6,104 over 10 days) | — |
| User rating | no reviews read | no reviews read |
| Review platforms | — | — |
| Owner | unclaimed | unclaimed |
| Reseller API | yes · /api/v2 | yes · /api/v2 |
| Status | online | online |
Prices on shared services
The lowest public rate per 1,000 on services at least two of these panels sell. The cheapest is not always the fastest: refill and drop are on each listing.
Cheapest across 12 rows: zeeeedha.com 7 · socialmediaservices.shop 5
| Service |  socialmediaservices.shop |  zeeeedha.com |
|---|---|---|
| Instagram followers | $1.24 | $2.53 |
| Instagram likes | $1.15 | $0.522 |
| Instagram views | $1.01 | $0.0052 |
| Instagram comments | $2.63 | $2.12 |
| Instagram shares | $1.50 | $0.039 |
| TikTok followers | $2.33 | $8.48 |
| TikTok likes | $1.65 | $0.636 |
| TikTok views | $1.11 | $0.143 |
| TikTok comments | $2.13 | $50.63 |
| YouTube likes | $2.35 | $1.69 |
| YouTube views | $1.78 | $2.84 |
| YouTube subscribers | $1.66 | $75.60 |
| YouTube comments | $9.12 | $17.82 |
| Telegram views | $1.02 | $0.0054 |
| Telegram members | $1.24 | $0.717 |
| Facebook followers | $1.35 | $2.29 |
| Facebook likes | $1.57 | $3.31 |
| Twitter / X followers | $2.44 | $3.38 |
| Twitter / X likes | $1.79 | $3.87 |
| Twitter / X views | $1.02 | $0.018 |
| Twitter / X comments | $62.75 | $168.75 |
| Snapchat followers | $40.60 | $57.49 |
Other comparisons
The nearest panels on the Trust Score to each side, online today.
socialmediaservices.shop against…
socialmediaservices.shop vs zeeeedha.com: questions and answers
Answers about socialmediaservices.shop vs zeeeedha.com from what we measured: the order counter, the price list, the registries and the review platforms. Facts last read November 4, 2026.
socialmediaservices.shop and zeeeedha.com both score 49 of 100 on the Trust Score. zeeeedha.com is the older of the two, online since 2014; socialmediaservices.shop since 2019. socialmediaservices.shop lists 4,799 services from $1.01 per 1,000, zeeeedha.com 209 from $0.0052. On the 8 services both sell, zeeeedha.com is cheaper on 6. socialmediaservices.shop shows a public counter — 11K orders, about 610 a day (+6,104 over 10 days) — while zeeeedha.com shows none. Neither has reviews on the platforms we read. Of the 5 measures compared, socialmediaservices.shop leads 3 and zeeeedha.com 2. Whichever you choose, start with a small order.
Comparing the lowest public rate per 1,000 on the services both sell — Instagram followers: $1.24 on socialmediaservices.shop against $2.53 on zeeeedha.com; Instagram likes: $1.15 on socialmediaservices.shop against $0.522 on zeeeedha.com; Instagram views: $1.01 on socialmediaservices.shop against $0.0052 on zeeeedha.com; Instagram comments: $2.63 on socialmediaservices.shop against $2.12 on zeeeedha.com. zeeeedha.com is cheaper on 6 of the 8; the cheapest offer on any service is not always the fastest or the most stable, so check refill and drop on each listing.
socialmediaservices.shop since 2019, 11K orders on its counter; zeeeedha.com since 2014, no public counter. Age comes from the registry record or the web archive and counts towards the Trust Score; a counter that keeps moving counts more than a large frozen one.
socialmediaservices.shop: unclaimed, no reviews read, Trust Score 49. zeeeedha.com: unclaimed, no reviews read, Trust Score 49. socialmediaservices.shop has the stronger evidence behind it, and neither figure is a guarantee: start with a small order, check the delivery, and read the reviews behind each rating on the listing.