smmcity.com vs svlikespro.com
Two SMM panels side by side, on the figures we measure — age from the registries, the public price list, the order counter, reviews on named platforms — not on what either says about itself. Updated November 6, 2026.
| 2 panels |
40/ 100 · Guarded
|
40/ 100 · Guarded
|
|---|---|---|
| Online since | 2023 | 2025 |
| Engine | Perfect Panel | Perfect Panel |
| Services listed | 130 | 439 |
| Lowest price | $0.06 per 1,000 | $0.002 per 1,000 |
| Order counter | not shown | 9,915 orders |
| Growth, 30 days | — | about 221 a day (+662 over 3 days) |
| User rating | 3.5 of 5 · 3 reviews | no reviews read |
| Review platforms | Trustpilot | — |
| Owner | unclaimed | unclaimed |
| Reseller API | yes · /api/v2 | yes · /api/v2 |
| Status | online | online |
Prices on shared services
The lowest public rate per 1,000 on services at least two of these panels sell. The cheapest is not always the fastest: refill and drop are on each listing.
Cheapest across 12 rows: svlikespro.com 11 · smmcity.com 1
| Service | ||
|---|---|---|
| Instagram likes | $1.50 | $0.18 |
| Instagram views | $0.50 | $0.002 |
| Instagram comments | $48.00 | $1.11 |
| Instagram shares | $0.06 | $0.026 |
| TikTok likes | $2.00 | $0.024 |
| TikTok views | $0.35 | $0.013 |
| TikTok comments | $210.00 | $9.41 |
| TikTok shares | $1.00 | $0.169 |
| YouTube likes | $1.31 | $1.95 |
| YouTube views | $2.10 | $1.05 |
| YouTube comments | $21.00 | $4.50 |
| Telegram likes | $0.08 | $0.059 |
| Telegram views | $0.10 | $0.028 |
| Telegram members | $1.50 | $1.23 |
| Facebook followers | $3.00 | $0.39 |
| Facebook likes | $1.20 | $0.253 |
| Facebook views | $0.45 | $0.069 |
| Facebook comments | $50.00 | $4.31 |
| Twitter / X followers | $27.00 | $14.03 |
| Twitter / X likes | $8.00 | $1.19 |
| Twitter / X views | $0.15 | $0.009 |
| Twitter / X shares | $15.00 | $2.23 |
| Spotify followers | $0.405 | $0.286 |
| Spotify views | $0.475 | $0.338 |
| Twitch followers | $1.80 | $0.225 |
| Snapchat followers | $38.00 | $20.70 |
Other comparisons
The nearest panels on the Trust Score to each side, online today.
smmcity.com vs svlikespro.com: questions and answers
Answers about smmcity.com vs svlikespro.com from what we measured: the order counter, the price list, the registries and the review platforms. Facts last read November 6, 2026.
smmcity.com and svlikespro.com both score 40 of 100 on the Trust Score. smmcity.com is the older of the two, online since 2023; svlikespro.com since 2025. smmcity.com lists 130 services from $0.06 per 1,000, svlikespro.com 439 from $0.002. On the 8 services both sell, svlikespro.com is cheaper on 8. svlikespro.com shows a public counter — 9,915 orders, about 221 a day (+662 over 3 days) — while smmcity.com shows none. smmcity.com is rated 3.5 of 5 across 3 reviews on the platforms we read; we found no reviews of svlikespro.com there. Of the 6 measures compared, svlikespro.com leads 4 and smmcity.com 2. Whichever you choose, start with a small order.
Comparing the lowest public rate per 1,000 on the services both sell — Instagram likes: $1.50 on smmcity.com against $0.18 on svlikespro.com; Instagram views: $0.50 on smmcity.com against $0.002 on svlikespro.com; Instagram comments: $48.00 on smmcity.com against $1.11 on svlikespro.com; Instagram shares: $0.06 on smmcity.com against $0.026 on svlikespro.com. svlikespro.com is cheaper on 8 of the 8; the cheapest offer on any service is not always the fastest or the most stable, so check refill and drop on each listing.
smmcity.com since 2023, no public counter; svlikespro.com since 2025, 9,915 orders on its counter. Age comes from the registry record or the web archive and counts towards the Trust Score; a counter that keeps moving counts more than a large frozen one.
smmcity.com: unclaimed, rated 3.5 across 3 reviews, Trust Score 40. svlikespro.com: unclaimed, no reviews read, Trust Score 40. svlikespro.com has the stronger evidence behind it, and neither figure is a guarantee: start with a small order, check the delivery, and read the reviews behind each rating on the listing.