smmai.net vs viralsmm.in
Two SMM panels side by side, on the figures we measure — age from the registries, the public price list, the order counter, reviews on named platforms — not on what either says about itself. Updated October 17, 2026.
| 2 panels |
41/ 100 · Guarded
|
42/ 100 · Fair
|
|---|---|---|
| Online since | 2023 | 2025 |
| Engine | Perfect Panel | Perfect Panel |
| Services listed | 797 | 4,594 |
| Lowest price | $0.01 per 1,000 | $0.0014 per 1,000 |
| Order counter | not shown | 603,222 orders |
| Growth, 30 days | — | about 8 a day (+252 over 30 days) |
| User rating | no reviews read | no reviews read |
| Review platforms | — | — |
| Owner | unclaimed | unclaimed |
| Reseller API | yes · /api/v2 | yes · /api/v2 |
| Status | offline | online |
Prices on shared services
The lowest public rate per 1,000 on services at least two of these panels sell. The cheapest is not always the fastest: refill and drop are on each listing.
Cheapest across 12 rows: viralsmm.in 11 · smmai.net 1
| Service | ||
|---|---|---|
| Instagram followers | $0.77 | $0.356 |
| Instagram likes | $0.19 | $0.014 |
| Instagram views | $0.02 | $0.002 |
| Instagram comments | $5.24 | $0.254 |
| Instagram shares | $0.03 | $0.013 |
| TikTok followers | $1.93 | $1.43 |
| TikTok likes | $0.15 | $0.079 |
| TikTok views | $0.01 | $0.0083 |
| YouTube likes | $0.89 | $0.183 |
| YouTube views | $0.49 | $0.216 |
| YouTube subscribers | $0.26 | $0.022 |
| YouTube comments | $0.40 | $1.03 |
| Telegram likes | $0.02 | $0.014 |
| Telegram views | $0.01 | $0.0024 |
| Telegram members | $0.21 | $0.015 |
| Telegram comments | $3.33 | $3.10 |
| Facebook followers | $0.35 | $0.338 |
| Facebook likes | $0.42 | $0.126 |
| Facebook views | $0.07 | $0.044 |
| Facebook members | $1.59 | $0.439 |
| Facebook comments | $86.40 | $3.48 |
| Twitter / X followers | $0.90 | $0.159 |
| Twitter / X likes | $0.62 | $0.159 |
| Twitter / X views | $0.01 | $0.0014 |
| Twitter / X shares | $0.56 | $0.159 |
| LinkedIn followers | $19.92 | $12.08 |
| LinkedIn likes | $10.07 | $4.47 |
| LinkedIn comments | $30.76 | $40.15 |
| Snapchat followers | $26.92 | $22.25 |
| Kwai likes | $0.36 | $1.37 |
Other comparisons
The nearest panels on the Trust Score to each side, online today.
smmai.net vs viralsmm.in: questions and answers
Answers about smmai.net vs viralsmm.in from what we measured: the order counter, the price list, the registries and the review platforms. Facts last read October 17, 2026.
viralsmm.in scores 42 of 100 on the Trust Score, smmai.net 41 — a 1-point gap. smmai.net is the older of the two, online since 2023; viralsmm.in since 2025. smmai.net lists 797 services from $0.01 per 1,000, viralsmm.in 4,594 from $0.0014. On the 8 services both sell, viralsmm.in is cheaper on 8. viralsmm.in shows a public counter — 603K orders, about 8 a day (+252 over 30 days) — while smmai.net shows none. Neither has reviews on the platforms we read. Of the 6 measures compared, viralsmm.in leads 5 and smmai.net 1. Whichever you choose, start with a small order.
Comparing the lowest public rate per 1,000 on the services both sell — Instagram followers: $0.77 on smmai.net against $0.356 on viralsmm.in; Instagram likes: $0.19 on smmai.net against $0.014 on viralsmm.in; Instagram views: $0.02 on smmai.net against $0.002 on viralsmm.in; Instagram comments: $5.24 on smmai.net against $0.254 on viralsmm.in. viralsmm.in is cheaper on 8 of the 8; the cheapest offer on any service is not always the fastest or the most stable, so check refill and drop on each listing.
smmai.net since 2023, no public counter; viralsmm.in since 2025, 603K orders on its counter. Age comes from the registry record or the web archive and counts towards the Trust Score; a counter that keeps moving counts more than a large frozen one.
smmai.net: unclaimed, no reviews read, Trust Score 41. viralsmm.in: unclaimed, no reviews read, Trust Score 42. viralsmm.in has the stronger evidence behind it, and neither figure is a guarantee: start with a small order, check the delivery, and read the reviews behind each rating on the listing.