smm-panel.net vs smmserver.org
Two SMM panels side by side, on the figures we measure — age from the registries, the public price list, the order counter, reviews on named platforms — not on what either says about itself. Updated September 17, 2026.
| 2 panels |
36/ 100 · Guarded
|
36/ 100 · Guarded
|
|---|---|---|
| Online since | 2025 | 2024 |
| Engine | Perfect Panel | Perfect Panel |
| Services listed | 1,081 | 1,060 |
| Lowest price | $0.005 per 1,000 | $0.0007 per 1,000 |
| Order counter | 1,350,000 orders | not shown |
| Growth, 30 days | no growth read | — |
| User rating | 4.5 of 5 · 1 reviews | no reviews read |
| Review platforms | Trustpilot | — |
| Owner | unclaimed | unclaimed |
| Reseller API | yes · /api/v2 | yes · /api/v2 |
| Status | online | online |
Prices on shared services
The lowest public rate per 1,000 on services at least two of these panels sell. Cheapest is not always fastest — refill and drop stand on each listing.
Cheapest across 12 rows: smmserver.org 11 · smm-panel.net 1
| Service |  smm-panel.net |  smmserver.org |
|---|---|---|
| Instagram followers | $0.40 | $0.198 |
| Instagram likes | $0.05 | $0.018 |
| Instagram views | $0.01 | $0.0007 |
| Instagram comments | $0.75 | $0.309 |
| Instagram shares | $0.02 | $0.0022 |
| TikTok followers | $1.50 | $0.782 |
| TikTok likes | $0.09 | $0.047 |
| TikTok views | $0.02 | $0.0033 |
| TikTok comments | $5.60 | $0.707 |
| YouTube likes | $0.75 | $1.02 |
| YouTube views | $1.68 | $0.33 |
| YouTube subscribers | $24.00 | $0.011 |
| Telegram likes | $0.03 | $0.0088 |
| Telegram members | $0.40 | $0.15 |
| Facebook followers | $0.27 | $0.076 |
| Facebook likes | $0.14 | $0.072 |
| Facebook views | $0.03 | $0.018 |
| Facebook members | $0.39 | $0.191 |
| Facebook comments | $4.28 | $1.60 |
| Facebook shares | $0.20 | $0.096 |
| Twitter / X followers | $2.00 | $0.748 |
| Twitter / X views | $0.005 | $0.0009 |
| Kick followers | $11.50 | $0.967 |
| WhatsApp likes | $0.04 | $0.02 |
| Kick views | $0.03 | $0.022 |
Other comparisons
The nearest panels on the Trust Score to each side, online today.
smm-panel.net against…
smm-panel.net vs smmserver.org: questions and answers
Straight answers about smm-panel.net vs smmserver.org, built from what we measured — the counter, the price list, the registries and the review platforms. Facts last read September 17, 2026.
smm-panel.net and smmserver.org both score 36 of 100 on the Trust Score. smmserver.org is the older of the two, online since 2024; smm-panel.net since 2025. smm-panel.net lists 1,081 services from $0.005 per 1,000, smmserver.org 1,060 from $0.0007. On the 8 services both sell, smmserver.org is cheaper on 8. smm-panel.net shows a public counter — 1.4M orders — while smmserver.org shows none. smm-panel.net is rated 4.5 of 5 across 1 reviews on the platforms we read; we found no reviews of smmserver.org there. Of the 5 measures compared, smm-panel.net leads 3 and smmserver.org 2. Whichever you choose, start with a small order.
Comparing the lowest public rate per 1,000 on the services both sell — Instagram followers: $0.40 on smm-panel.net against $0.198 on smmserver.org; Instagram likes: $0.05 on smm-panel.net against $0.018 on smmserver.org; Instagram views: $0.01 on smm-panel.net against $0.0007 on smmserver.org; Instagram comments: $0.75 on smm-panel.net against $0.309 on smmserver.org. smmserver.org is cheaper on 8 of the 8; the cheapest offer on any service is not always the fastest or the most stable, so check refill and drop on each listing.
smm-panel.net since 2025, 1.4M orders on its counter; smmserver.org since 2024, no public counter. Age comes from the registry record or the web archive and counts towards the Trust Score; a counter that keeps moving counts more than a large frozen one.
smm-panel.net: unclaimed, rated 4.5 across 1 reviews, Trust Score 36. smmserver.org: unclaimed, no reviews read, Trust Score 36. smm-panel.net has the stronger evidence behind it, and neither figure is a guarantee: start with a small order, check the delivery, and read the reviews behind each rating on the listing.