sfdoudou.xyz vs sosyaladresim.com
Two SMM panels side by side, on the figures we measure — age from the registries, the public price list, the order counter, reviews on named platforms — not on what either says about itself. Updated October 20, 2026.
| 2 panels |
46/ 100 · Fair
|
44/ 100 · Fair
|
|---|---|---|
| Online since | 2022 | 2020 |
| Engine | Perfect Panel | Perfect Panel |
| Services listed | 1,340 | 1,473 |
| Lowest price | $0.02 per 1,000 | $0.004 per 1,000 |
| Order counter | not shown | 177,839 orders |
| Growth, 30 days | — | about 10 a day (+295 over 30 days) |
| User rating | no reviews read | no reviews read |
| Review platforms | — | — |
| Owner | unclaimed | unclaimed |
| Reseller API | yes · /api/v2 | yes · /api/v2 |
| Status | online | online |
Prices on shared services
The lowest public rate per 1,000 on services at least two of these panels sell. The cheapest is not always the fastest: refill and drop are on each listing.
Cheapest across 12 rows: sosyaladresim.com 12
| Service | ||
|---|---|---|
| Instagram followers | $5.05 | $0.408 |
| Instagram likes | $0.55 | $0.144 |
| Instagram views | $0.02 | $0.004 |
| Instagram comments | $21.00 | $0.72 |
| Instagram shares | $0.26 | $0.019 |
| TikTok followers | $10.98 | $2.38 |
| TikTok likes | $2.21 | $0.036 |
| TikTok views | $0.33 | $0.084 |
| TikTok comments | $161.32 | $1.56 |
| TikTok shares | $1.17 | $0.192 |
| YouTube likes | $4.62 | $1.66 |
| YouTube views | $5.10 | $1.20 |
| YouTube subscribers | $10.56 | $3.36 |
| YouTube comments | $34.26 | $6.00 |
| YouTube shares | $3.96 | $0.36 |
| Telegram views | $0.06 | $0.012 |
| Telegram comments | $7.32 | $3.60 |
| Telegram shares | $0.06 | $0.093 |
| Facebook followers | $1.08 | $0.454 |
| Facebook likes | $18.00 | $0.384 |
| Facebook views | $0.36 | $0.168 |
| Twitter / X followers | $33.80 | $1.66 |
| Twitter / X likes | $17.58 | $3.60 |
| Twitter / X views | $0.03 | $0.013 |
| Twitter / X comments | $221.76 | $59.43 |
| Twitter / X shares | $10.86 | $0.24 |
Other comparisons
The nearest panels on the Trust Score to each side, online today.
sfdoudou.xyz against…
sfdoudou.xyz vs sosyaladresim.com: questions and answers
Answers about sfdoudou.xyz vs sosyaladresim.com from what we measured: the order counter, the price list, the registries and the review platforms. Facts last read October 20, 2026.
sfdoudou.xyz scores 46 of 100 on the Trust Score, sosyaladresim.com 44 — a 2-point gap. sosyaladresim.com is the older of the two, online since 2020; sfdoudou.xyz since 2022. sfdoudou.xyz lists 1,340 services from $0.02 per 1,000, sosyaladresim.com 1,473 from $0.004. On the 8 services both sell, sosyaladresim.com is cheaper on 8. sosyaladresim.com shows a public counter — 178K orders, about 10 a day (+295 over 30 days) — while sfdoudou.xyz shows none. Neither has reviews on the platforms we read. Of the 6 measures compared, sosyaladresim.com leads 5 and sfdoudou.xyz 1. Whichever you choose, start with a small order.
Comparing the lowest public rate per 1,000 on the services both sell — Instagram followers: $5.05 on sfdoudou.xyz against $0.408 on sosyaladresim.com; Instagram likes: $0.55 on sfdoudou.xyz against $0.144 on sosyaladresim.com; Instagram views: $0.02 on sfdoudou.xyz against $0.004 on sosyaladresim.com; Instagram comments: $21.00 on sfdoudou.xyz against $0.72 on sosyaladresim.com. sosyaladresim.com is cheaper on 8 of the 8; the cheapest offer on any service is not always the fastest or the most stable, so check refill and drop on each listing.
sfdoudou.xyz since 2022, no public counter; sosyaladresim.com since 2020, 178K orders on its counter. Age comes from the registry record or the web archive and counts towards the Trust Score; a counter that keeps moving counts more than a large frozen one.
sfdoudou.xyz: unclaimed, no reviews read, Trust Score 46. sosyaladresim.com: unclaimed, no reviews read, Trust Score 44. sosyaladresim.com has the stronger evidence behind it, and neither figure is a guarantee: start with a small order, check the delivery, and read the reviews behind each rating on the listing.