ratesbeater.com vs smm.securenexpay.com
Two SMM panels side by side, on the figures we measure — age from the registries, the public price list, the order counter, reviews on named platforms — not on what either says about itself. Updated September 20, 2026.
| 2 panels |
26/ 100 · Weak
|
26/ 100 · Weak
|
|---|---|---|
| Online since | 2025 | 2026 |
| Engine | Perfect Panel | SMM (Other/Custom) |
| Services listed | 1,093 | 932 |
| Lowest price | $0.0007 per 1,000 | $0.0013 per 1,000 |
| Order counter | not shown | 220,002 orders |
| Growth, 30 days | — | no growth read |
| User rating | no reviews read | no reviews read |
| Review platforms | — | — |
| Owner | unclaimed | unclaimed |
| Reseller API | yes · /api/v2 | not confirmed |
| Status | online | online |
Prices on shared services
The lowest public rate per 1,000 on services at least two of these panels sell. Cheapest is not always fastest — refill and drop stand on each listing.
Cheapest across 12 rows: ratesbeater.com 8 · smm.securenexpay.com 4
| Service |  ratesbeater.com |  smm.securenexpay.com |
|---|---|---|
| Instagram followers | $0.193 | $0.142 |
| Instagram likes | $0.023 | $0.058 |
| Instagram views | $0.0007 | $0.0013 |
| Instagram comments | $0.476 | $0.206 |
| TikTok followers | $0.718 | $2.77 |
| TikTok likes | $0.043 | $0.121 |
| TikTok views | $0.0033 | $0.039 |
| TikTok comments | $5.95 | $9.74 |
| YouTube likes | $0.335 | $1.38 |
| YouTube views | $0.428 | $0.278 |
| YouTube subscribers | $0.115 | $20.25 |
| YouTube comments | $3.37 | $2.89 |
| Telegram likes | $0.018 | $0.012 |
| Telegram views | $0.0015 | $0.048 |
| Telegram members | $0.011 | $0.013 |
| Facebook followers | $0.105 | $0.299 |
| Facebook likes | $0.074 | $0.357 |
| Facebook views | $0.02 | $0.027 |
| Facebook members | $0.277 | $0.538 |
| Facebook comments | $1.22 | $0.674 |
| Twitter / X followers | $0.92 | $0.99 |
| Twitter / X likes | $1.15 | $2.07 |
| Twitter / X views | $0.0021 | $0.0024 |
Other comparisons
The nearest panels on the Trust Score to each side, online today.
ratesbeater.com against…
ratesbeater.com vs smm.securenexpay.com: questions and answers
Straight answers about ratesbeater.com vs smm.securenexpay.com, built from what we measured — the counter, the price list, the registries and the review platforms. Facts last read September 20, 2026.
ratesbeater.com and smm.securenexpay.com both score 26 of 100 on the Trust Score. ratesbeater.com is the older of the two, online since 2025; smm.securenexpay.com since 2026. ratesbeater.com lists 1,093 services from $0.0007 per 1,000, smm.securenexpay.com 932 from $0.0013. On the 8 services both sell, ratesbeater.com is cheaper on 6. smm.securenexpay.com shows a public counter — 220K orders — while ratesbeater.com shows none. Neither has reviews on the platforms we read. Of the 4 measures compared, ratesbeater.com leads 3 and smm.securenexpay.com 1. Whichever you choose, start with a small order.
Comparing the lowest public rate per 1,000 on the services both sell — Instagram followers: $0.193 on ratesbeater.com against $0.142 on smm.securenexpay.com; Instagram likes: $0.023 on ratesbeater.com against $0.058 on smm.securenexpay.com; Instagram views: $0.0007 on ratesbeater.com against $0.0013 on smm.securenexpay.com; Instagram comments: $0.476 on ratesbeater.com against $0.206 on smm.securenexpay.com. ratesbeater.com is cheaper on 6 of the 8; the cheapest offer on any service is not always the fastest or the most stable, so check refill and drop on each listing.
ratesbeater.com since 2025, no public counter; smm.securenexpay.com since 2026, 220K orders on its counter. Age comes from the registry record or the web archive and counts towards the Trust Score; a counter that keeps moving counts more than a large frozen one.
ratesbeater.com: unclaimed, no reviews read, Trust Score 26. smm.securenexpay.com: unclaimed, no reviews read, Trust Score 26. ratesbeater.com has the stronger evidence behind it, and neither figure is a guarantee: start with a small order, check the delivery, and read the reviews behind each rating on the listing.