qualitypanel.org vs zfam.in
Two SMM panels side by side, on the figures we measure — age from the registries, the public price list, the order counter, reviews on named platforms — not on what either says about itself. Updated October 30, 2026.
| 2 panels |
35/ 100 · Guarded
|
35/ 100 · Guarded
|
|---|---|---|
| Online since | 2024 | 2025 |
| Engine | Perfect Panel | Perfect Panel |
| Services listed | 2,793 | 727 |
| Lowest price | $0.0005 per 1,000 | $0.001 per 1,000 |
| Order counter | not shown | 38,372,912 orders |
| Growth, 30 days | — | no growth read |
| User rating | 2.5 of 5 · 5 reviews | no reviews read |
| Review platforms | Trustpilot | — |
| Owner | unclaimed | unclaimed |
| Reseller API | yes · /api/v2 | yes · /api/v2 |
| Status | online | online |
Prices on shared services
The lowest public rate per 1,000 on services at least two of these panels sell. The cheapest is not always the fastest: refill and drop are on each listing.
Cheapest across 12 rows: qualitypanel.org 7 · zfam.in 5
| Service |  qualitypanel.org |  zfam.in |
|---|---|---|
| Instagram followers | $0.233 | $0.261 |
| Instagram likes | $0.035 | $0.035 |
| Instagram views | $0.0007 | $0.001 |
| Instagram comments | $0.485 | $0.393 |
| Instagram shares | $0.0005 | $0.0093 |
| TikTok followers | $0.563 | $1.22 |
| TikTok likes | $0.049 | $0.019 |
| TikTok views | $0.0037 | $0.001 |
| TikTok comments | $0.63 | $0.352 |
| YouTube likes | $0.126 | $0.145 |
| YouTube views | $0.166 | $0.448 |
| YouTube subscribers | $0.011 | $0.126 |
| YouTube comments | $2.44 | $3.65 |
| Telegram likes | $0.011 | $0.016 |
| Telegram views | $0.0015 | $0.0019 |
| Telegram members | $0.012 | $0.089 |
| Facebook followers | $0.107 | $0.067 |
| Facebook likes | $0.088 | $0.087 |
| Facebook views | $0.0049 | $0.019 |
| Facebook members | $0.195 | $0.252 |
| Facebook comments | $0.485 | $0.743 |
| Facebook shares | $0.014 | $0.027 |
| Twitter / X followers | $0.57 | $1.17 |
| Twitter / X likes | $0.533 | $0.637 |
| Twitter / X views | $0.0005 | $0.0082 |
| WhatsApp likes | $0.019 | $0.818 |
| WhatsApp members | $0.20 | $1.88 |
Other comparisons
The nearest panels on the Trust Score to each side, online today.
qualitypanel.org vs zfam.in: questions and answers
Answers about qualitypanel.org vs zfam.in from what we measured: the order counter, the price list, the registries and the review platforms. Facts last read October 30, 2026.
qualitypanel.org and zfam.in both score 35 of 100 on the Trust Score. qualitypanel.org is the older of the two, online since 2024; zfam.in since 2025. qualitypanel.org lists 2,793 services from $0.0005 per 1,000, zfam.in 727 from $0.001. On the 8 services both sell, neither is cheaper overall. zfam.in shows a public counter — 38M orders — while qualitypanel.org shows none. qualitypanel.org is rated 2.5 of 5 across 5 reviews on the platforms we read; we found no reviews of zfam.in there. Of the 4 measures compared, qualitypanel.org leads 3 and zfam.in 1. Whichever you choose, start with a small order.
Comparing the lowest public rate per 1,000 on the services both sell — Instagram followers: $0.233 on qualitypanel.org against $0.261 on zfam.in; Instagram likes: $0.035 on qualitypanel.org against $0.035 on zfam.in; Instagram views: $0.0007 on qualitypanel.org against $0.001 on zfam.in; Instagram comments: $0.485 on qualitypanel.org against $0.393 on zfam.in. Neither is cheaper overall; the cheapest offer on any service is not always the fastest or the most stable, so check refill and drop on each listing.
qualitypanel.org since 2024, no public counter; zfam.in since 2025, 38M orders on its counter. Age comes from the registry record or the web archive and counts towards the Trust Score; a counter that keeps moving counts more than a large frozen one.
qualitypanel.org: unclaimed, rated 2.5 across 5 reviews, Trust Score 35. zfam.in: unclaimed, no reviews read, Trust Score 35. qualitypanel.org has the stronger evidence behind it, and neither figure is a guarantee: start with a small order, check the delivery, and read the reviews behind each rating on the listing.