Home / Compare / peakerr.com vs smmturk.org

peakerr.com vs smmturk.org

Two SMM panels side by side, on the figures we measure — age from the registries, the public price list, the order counter, reviews on named platforms — not on what either says about itself. Updated September 9, 2026.

Trust Score
59 / 100 · Solid
66 / 100 · Solid
Online since
2014
2022
Engine
Perfect Panel
Perfect Panel
Services listed
9
8,272
Lowest price
$0.01 per 1,000
$0.0009 per 1,000
Order counter
80,678,071 orders
245,172,069 orders
Growth, 30 days
+496,191 orders in 30 days, about 16,540 a day
+6,223,722 orders in 30 days, about 207,457 a day
User rating
1.1 of 5 · 61 reviews
4.0 of 5 · 216 reviews
Review platforms
Reviews.io, Sitejabber
Trustpilot, RatingFacts
Owner
unclaimed
unclaimed
Reseller API
yes
yes
Status
online
online
Open peakerr.com Open smmturk.org the better figure of the two

Verdict

smmturk.org scores 66 of 100 on the Trust Score, peakerr.com 59 — a 7-point gap. peakerr.com is the older of the two, online since 2014; smmturk.org since 2022. peakerr.com lists 9 services from $0.01 per 1,000, smmturk.org 8,272 from $0.0009. On the 7 services both sell, peakerr.com is cheaper on 4. peakerr.com's public counter stands at 81M orders (+496,191 orders in 30 days, about 16,540 a day), smmturk.org's at 245M (+6,223,722 orders in 30 days, about 207,457 a day). Users rate peakerr.com 1.1 of 5 across 61 reviews, smmturk.org 4.0 across 216. smmturk.org is the stronger pick on the figures, with peakerr.com close behind. Whichever you choose, start with a small order.

Prices on the services both sell

The lowest public rate per 1,000 for each service, in US dollars at the day's rate. Cheapest is not always fastest — refill and drop stand on each listing.

Service
peakerr.com
smmturk.org
Instagram followers
$0.08
$0.296
Instagram likes
$0.02
$0.025
TikTok views
$0.01
$0.0044
YouTube views
$0.05
$0.13
YouTube subscribers
$0.15
$0.013
Telegram members
$0.10
$0.022
Facebook likes
$0.04
$0.065

Other comparisons

The nearest panels on the Trust Score to each side, online today.

peakerr.com vs smmturk.org: questions and answers

Straight answers about peakerr.com vs smmturk.org, built from what we measured — the counter, the price list, the registries and the review platforms. Updated September 9, 2026.

smmturk.org scores 66 of 100 on the Trust Score, peakerr.com 59 — a 7-point gap. peakerr.com is the older of the two, online since 2014; smmturk.org since 2022. peakerr.com lists 9 services from $0.01 per 1,000, smmturk.org 8,272 from $0.0009. On the 7 services both sell, peakerr.com is cheaper on 4. peakerr.com's public counter stands at 81M orders (+496,191 orders in 30 days, about 16,540 a day), smmturk.org's at 245M (+6,223,722 orders in 30 days, about 207,457 a day). Users rate peakerr.com 1.1 of 5 across 61 reviews, smmturk.org 4.0 across 216. smmturk.org is the stronger pick on the figures, with peakerr.com close behind. Whichever you choose, start with a small order.

Comparing the lowest public rate per 1,000 on the services both sell — Instagram followers: $0.08 on peakerr.com against $0.296 on smmturk.org; Instagram likes: $0.02 on peakerr.com against $0.025 on smmturk.org; TikTok views: $0.01 on peakerr.com against $0.0044 on smmturk.org; YouTube views: $0.05 on peakerr.com against $0.13 on smmturk.org. peakerr.com is cheaper on 4 of the 7; the cheapest offer on any service is not always the fastest or the most stable, so check refill and drop on each listing.

peakerr.com since 2014, 81M orders on its counter; smmturk.org since 2022, 245M orders on its counter. Age comes from the registry record or the web archive and counts towards the Trust Score; a counter that keeps moving counts more than a large frozen one.

peakerr.com: unclaimed, rated 1.1 across 61 reviews, Trust Score 59. smmturk.org: unclaimed, rated 4.0 across 216 reviews, Trust Score 66. smmturk.org has the stronger evidence behind it, and neither figure is a guarantee: start with a small order, check the delivery, and read the reviews behind each rating on the listing.