mundosmm.com vs ogaviral.com
Two SMM panels side by side, on the figures we measure — age from the registries, the public price list, the order counter, reviews on named platforms — not on what either says about itself. Updated November 7, 2026.
| 2 panels |
37/ 100 · Guarded
|
37/ 100 · Guarded
|
|---|---|---|
| Online since | 2024 | 2025 |
| Engine | Perfect Panel | Perfect Panel |
| Services listed | 356 | 4,254 |
| Lowest price | $0.0018 per 1,000 | $0.0013 per 1,000 |
| Order counter | not shown | 1,659,146 orders |
| Growth, 30 days | — | about 1,027 a day (+25,682 over 25 days) |
| User rating | no reviews read | 2.9 of 5 · 3 reviews |
| Review platforms | — | Trustpilot |
| Owner | unclaimed | verified |
| Reseller API | yes · /api/v2 | yes · /api/v2 |
| Status | online | online |
Prices on shared services
The lowest public rate per 1,000 on services at least two of these panels sell. The cheapest is not always the fastest: refill and drop are on each listing.
Cheapest across 12 rows: ogaviral.com 10 · mundosmm.com 2
| Service |  mundosmm.com |  ogaviral.com |
|---|---|---|
| Instagram views | $0.0018 | $0.0013 |
| TikTok followers | $2.19 | $1.79 |
| TikTok likes | $0.539 | $0.515 |
| TikTok views | $0.027 | $0.019 |
| TikTok comments | $9.14 | $0.30 |
| TikTok shares | $0.146 | $0.156 |
| YouTube likes | $1.46 | $0.394 |
| YouTube views | $0.914 | $0.549 |
| YouTube comments | $3.29 | $3.74 |
| YouTube shares | $0.549 | $0.447 |
| Telegram views | $0.018 | $0.003 |
| Telegram members | $0.732 | $0.28 |
| Facebook followers | $1.80 | $0.338 |
| Facebook likes | $1.46 | $0.40 |
| Facebook views | $0.366 | $0.061 |
| Facebook members | $2.01 | $0.525 |
| Facebook comments | $32.92 | $3.99 |
| Twitter / X comments | $82.29 | $5.01 |
| Twitter / X shares | $0.549 | $1.43 |
| Twitch followers | $0.594 | $0.249 |
| Threads followers | $2.74 | $8.97 |
| Threads shares | $6.95 | $4.04 |
| Discord members | $25.60 | $3.09 |
Other comparisons
The nearest panels on the Trust Score to each side, online today.
mundosmm.com vs ogaviral.com: questions and answers
Answers about mundosmm.com vs ogaviral.com from what we measured: the order counter, the price list, the registries and the review platforms. Facts last read November 7, 2026.
mundosmm.com and ogaviral.com both score 37 of 100 on the Trust Score. mundosmm.com is the older of the two, online since 2024; ogaviral.com since 2025. mundosmm.com lists 356 services from $0.0018 per 1,000, ogaviral.com 4,254 from $0.0013. On the 8 services both sell, ogaviral.com is cheaper on 7. ogaviral.com shows a public counter — 1.7M orders, about 1,027 a day (+25,682 over 25 days) — while mundosmm.com shows none. ogaviral.com is rated 2.9 of 5 across 3 reviews on the platforms we read; we found no reviews of mundosmm.com there. ogaviral.com's owner has verified the listing on smm.guide; mundosmm.com is unclaimed. Of the 6 measures compared, ogaviral.com leads 5 and mundosmm.com 1. Whichever you choose, start with a small order.
Comparing the lowest public rate per 1,000 on the services both sell — Instagram views: $0.0018 on mundosmm.com against $0.0013 on ogaviral.com; TikTok followers: $2.19 on mundosmm.com against $1.79 on ogaviral.com; TikTok likes: $0.539 on mundosmm.com against $0.515 on ogaviral.com; TikTok views: $0.027 on mundosmm.com against $0.019 on ogaviral.com. ogaviral.com is cheaper on 7 of the 8; the cheapest offer on any service is not always the fastest or the most stable, so check refill and drop on each listing.
mundosmm.com since 2024, no public counter; ogaviral.com since 2025, 1.7M orders on its counter. Age comes from the registry record or the web archive and counts towards the Trust Score; a counter that keeps moving counts more than a large frozen one.
mundosmm.com: unclaimed, no reviews read, Trust Score 37. ogaviral.com: owner verified, rated 2.9 across 3 reviews, Trust Score 37. ogaviral.com has the stronger evidence behind it, and neither figure is a guarantee: start with a small order, check the delivery, and read the reviews behind each rating on the listing.