likeo.net vs socialdoc.cc
Two SMM panels side by side, on the figures we measure — age from the registries, the public price list, the order counter, reviews on named platforms — not on what either says about itself. Updated October 12, 2026.
| 2 panels |
31/ 100 · Guarded
|
31/ 100 · Guarded
|
|---|---|---|
| Online since | 2025 | 2022 |
| Engine | Perfect Panel | Perfect Panel |
| Services listed | 4,929 | 883 |
| Lowest price | $0.0003 per 1,000 | $0.003 per 1,000 |
| Order counter | 12,391,414 orders | not shown |
| Growth, 30 days | about 39,424 a day (+1,182,734 over 30 days) | — |
| User rating | no reviews read | no reviews read |
| Review platforms | — | — |
| Owner | unclaimed | unclaimed |
| Reseller API | yes · /api/v2 | yes · /api/v2 |
| Status | online | online |
Prices on shared services
The lowest public rate per 1,000 on services at least two of these panels sell. The cheapest is not always the fastest: refill and drop are on each listing.
Cheapest across 12 rows: likeo.net 9 · socialdoc.cc 3
| Service | ||
|---|---|---|
| Instagram followers | $0.169 | $0.44 |
| Instagram likes | $0.038 | $0.161 |
| Instagram views | $0.0004 | $0.003 |
| Instagram comments | $0.338 | $0.965 |
| Instagram shares | $0.0003 | $0.486 |
| TikTok followers | $0.63 | $0.833 |
| TikTok likes | $0.052 | $0.04 |
| TikTok views | $0.0026 | $0.016 |
| TikTok comments | $1.78 | $3.31 |
| TikTok shares | $0.015 | $0.0045 |
| YouTube likes | $0.06 | $0.441 |
| YouTube views | $0.181 | $0.124 |
| YouTube subscribers | $0.02 | $93.47 |
| YouTube comments | $0.881 | $6.04 |
| Telegram views | $0.0003 | $0.019 |
| Telegram members | $0.16 | $0.268 |
| Telegram comments | $1.80 | $4.08 |
| Facebook followers | $0.103 | $0.556 |
| Facebook likes | $0.067 | $0.206 |
| Facebook views | $0.017 | $0.069 |
| Facebook members | $0.175 | $1.47 |
| Facebook comments | $1.35 | $10.58 |
| Facebook shares | $0.016 | $2.53 |
| Twitter / X followers | $0.495 | $37.42 |
| Twitter / X likes | $0.462 | $5.19 |
| Twitter / X views | $0.001 | $0.0089 |
| LinkedIn followers | $4.00 | $23.24 |
| LinkedIn shares | $0.972 | $76.82 |
| WhatsApp members | $0.196 | $15.03 |
Other comparisons
The nearest panels on the Trust Score to each side, online today.
likeo.net vs socialdoc.cc: questions and answers
Answers about likeo.net vs socialdoc.cc from what we measured: the order counter, the price list, the registries and the review platforms. Facts last read October 12, 2026.
likeo.net and socialdoc.cc both score 31 of 100 on the Trust Score. socialdoc.cc is the older of the two, online since 2022; likeo.net since 2025. likeo.net lists 4,929 services from $0.0003 per 1,000, socialdoc.cc 883 from $0.003. On the 8 services both sell, likeo.net is cheaper on 7. likeo.net shows a public counter — 12M orders, about 39,424 a day (+1,182,734 over 30 days) — while socialdoc.cc shows none. Neither has reviews on the platforms we read. Of the 5 measures compared, likeo.net leads 4 and socialdoc.cc 1. Whichever you choose, start with a small order.
Comparing the lowest public rate per 1,000 on the services both sell — Instagram followers: $0.169 on likeo.net against $0.44 on socialdoc.cc; Instagram likes: $0.038 on likeo.net against $0.161 on socialdoc.cc; Instagram views: $0.0004 on likeo.net against $0.003 on socialdoc.cc; Instagram comments: $0.338 on likeo.net against $0.965 on socialdoc.cc. likeo.net is cheaper on 7 of the 8; the cheapest offer on any service is not always the fastest or the most stable, so check refill and drop on each listing.
likeo.net since 2025, 12M orders on its counter; socialdoc.cc since 2022, no public counter. Age comes from the registry record or the web archive and counts towards the Trust Score; a counter that keeps moving counts more than a large frozen one.
likeo.net: unclaimed, no reviews read, Trust Score 31. socialdoc.cc: unclaimed, no reviews read, Trust Score 31. likeo.net has the stronger evidence behind it, and neither figure is a guarantee: start with a small order, check the delivery, and read the reviews behind each rating on the listing.