juanjoserver.com vs ogaviral.com
Two SMM panels side by side, on the figures we measure — age from the registries, the public price list, the order counter, reviews on named platforms — not on what either says about itself. Updated September 26, 2026.
| 2 panels |
22/ 100 · Weak
|
22/ 100 · Weak
|
|---|---|---|
| Online since | 2024 | 2025 |
| Engine | Perfect Panel | Perfect Panel |
| Services listed | 186 | 1,992 |
| Lowest price | $0.01 per 1,000 | $0.0015 per 1,000 |
| Order counter | not shown | not shown |
| Growth, 30 days | — | — |
| User rating | no reviews read | 2.9 of 5 · 3 reviews |
| Review platforms | — | Trustpilot |
| Owner | unclaimed | verified |
| Reseller API | yes · /api/v2 | yes · /api/v2 |
| Status | online | online |
Prices on shared services
The lowest public rate per 1,000 on services at least two of these panels sell. Cheapest is not always fastest — refill and drop stand on each listing.
Cheapest across 12 rows: ogaviral.com 10 · juanjoserver.com 2
| Service |  juanjoserver.com |  ogaviral.com |
|---|---|---|
| Instagram followers | $1.59 | $0.445 |
| Instagram likes | $0.06 | $0.074 |
| Instagram views | $0.01 | $0.0023 |
| TikTok followers | $2.19 | $2.37 |
| TikTok likes | $0.31 | $0.152 |
| TikTok views | $0.07 | $0.0083 |
| YouTube likes | $1.43 | $0.623 |
| YouTube views | $0.94 | $0.518 |
| YouTube subscribers | $0.63 | $0.011 |
| Telegram views | $0.02 | $0.0068 |
| Telegram members | $0.69 | $0.05 |
| Facebook followers | $0.22 | $0.218 |
| Facebook likes | $0.18 | $0.149 |
| Facebook views | $0.05 | $0.043 |
| Facebook comments | $3.53 | $4.96 |
| Twitter / X followers | $1.10 | $1.97 |
| Twitter / X likes | $5.20 | $0.881 |
| Spotify followers | $0.58 | $0.463 |
| Spotify views | $0.23 | $0.193 |
| Twitch followers | $0.31 | $0.245 |
| Threads followers | $2.40 | $7.46 |
| LinkedIn followers | $47.50 | $16.86 |
| LinkedIn likes | $14.40 | $14.45 |
| WhatsApp likes | $0.05 | $0.05 |
| WhatsApp members | $0.44 | $0.052 |
Other comparisons
The nearest panels on the Trust Score to each side, online today.
juanjoserver.com against…
juanjoserver.com vs ogaviral.com: questions and answers
Straight answers about juanjoserver.com vs ogaviral.com, built from what we measured — the counter, the price list, the registries and the review platforms. Facts last read September 26, 2026.
juanjoserver.com and ogaviral.com both score 22 of 100 on the Trust Score. juanjoserver.com is the older of the two, online since 2024; ogaviral.com since 2025. juanjoserver.com lists 186 services from $0.01 per 1,000, ogaviral.com 1,992 from $0.0015. On the 8 services both sell, ogaviral.com is cheaper on 6. ogaviral.com is rated 2.9 of 5 across 3 reviews on the platforms we read; we found no reviews of juanjoserver.com there. ogaviral.com's owner has verified the listing on smm.guide; juanjoserver.com is unclaimed. Of the 4 measures compared, ogaviral.com leads 3 and juanjoserver.com 1. Whichever you choose, start with a small order.
Comparing the lowest public rate per 1,000 on the services both sell — Instagram followers: $1.59 on juanjoserver.com against $0.445 on ogaviral.com; Instagram likes: $0.06 on juanjoserver.com against $0.074 on ogaviral.com; Instagram views: $0.01 on juanjoserver.com against $0.0023 on ogaviral.com; TikTok followers: $2.19 on juanjoserver.com against $2.37 on ogaviral.com. ogaviral.com is cheaper on 6 of the 8; the cheapest offer on any service is not always the fastest or the most stable, so check refill and drop on each listing.
juanjoserver.com since 2024, no public counter; ogaviral.com since 2025, no public counter. Age comes from the registry record or the web archive and counts towards the Trust Score; a counter that keeps moving counts more than a large frozen one.
juanjoserver.com: unclaimed, no reviews read, Trust Score 22. ogaviral.com: owner verified, rated 2.9 across 3 reviews, Trust Score 22. ogaviral.com has the stronger evidence behind it, and neither figure is a guarantee: start with a small order, check the delivery, and read the reviews behind each rating on the listing.