jiangshifen.vip vs socialmediagrow.in
Two SMM panels side by side, on the figures we measure — age from the registries, the public price list, the order counter, reviews on named platforms — not on what either says about itself. Updated November 5, 2026.
| 2 panels |
27/ 100 · Weak
|
29/ 100 · Guarded
|
|---|---|---|
| Online since | 2023 | 2026 |
| Engine | Perfect Panel | RentalPanel |
| Services listed | 704 | 1,663 |
| Lowest price | $0.0047 per 1,000 | $0.0016 per 1,000 |
| Order counter | not shown | 6,285,532 orders |
| Growth, 30 days | — | no growth read |
| User rating | no reviews read | no reviews read |
| Review platforms | — | — |
| Owner | unclaimed | unclaimed |
| Reseller API | yes · /api/v2 | yes · /api/v2 |
| Status | online | online |
Prices on shared services
The lowest public rate per 1,000 on services at least two of these panels sell. The cheapest is not always the fastest: refill and drop are on each listing.
Cheapest across 12 rows: socialmediagrow.in 9 · jiangshifen.vip 3
| Service |  jiangshifen.vip |  socialmediagrow.in |
|---|---|---|
| Instagram followers | $0.986 | $2.50 |
| Instagram comments | $9.14 | $0.808 |
| TikTok followers | $2.44 | $1.09 |
| TikTok likes | $0.028 | $0.232 |
| TikTok comments | $4.03 | $0.855 |
| YouTube views | $4.08 | $0.503 |
| YouTube subscribers | $13.33 | $0.013 |
| YouTube comments | $2.42 | $1.45 |
| Telegram likes | $0.064 | $0.014 |
| Telegram views | $0.0047 | $0.0023 |
| Telegram members | $0.138 | $0.152 |
| Telegram comments | $3.36 | $2.88 |
| Facebook followers | $0.307 | $0.237 |
| Facebook likes | $0.23 | $0.185 |
| Facebook views | $0.702 | $0.032 |
| Facebook members | $6.06 | $0.375 |
| Facebook comments | $84.83 | $2.78 |
| Twitter / X followers | $1.23 | $2.00 |
| Twitter / X likes | $1.72 | $1.75 |
| Twitter / X views | $0.0079 | $0.0054 |
| Twitter / X comments | $43.83 | $35.29 |
| LinkedIn followers | $25.35 | $16.62 |
| WhatsApp members | $7.07 | $0.305 |
Other comparisons
The nearest panels on the Trust Score to each side, online today.
jiangshifen.vip against…
jiangshifen.vip vs socialmediagrow.in: questions and answers
Answers about jiangshifen.vip vs socialmediagrow.in from what we measured: the order counter, the price list, the registries and the review platforms. Facts last read November 5, 2026.
socialmediagrow.in scores 29 of 100 on the Trust Score, jiangshifen.vip 27 — a 2-point gap. jiangshifen.vip is the older of the two, online since 2023; socialmediagrow.in since 2026. jiangshifen.vip lists 704 services from $0.0047 per 1,000, socialmediagrow.in 1,663 from $0.0016. On the 8 services both sell, socialmediagrow.in is cheaper on 6. socialmediagrow.in shows a public counter — 6.3M orders — while jiangshifen.vip shows none. Neither has reviews on the platforms we read. Of the 5 measures compared, socialmediagrow.in leads 4 and jiangshifen.vip 1. Whichever you choose, start with a small order.
Comparing the lowest public rate per 1,000 on the services both sell — Instagram followers: $0.986 on jiangshifen.vip against $2.50 on socialmediagrow.in; Instagram comments: $9.14 on jiangshifen.vip against $0.808 on socialmediagrow.in; TikTok followers: $2.44 on jiangshifen.vip against $1.09 on socialmediagrow.in; TikTok likes: $0.028 on jiangshifen.vip against $0.232 on socialmediagrow.in. socialmediagrow.in is cheaper on 6 of the 8; the cheapest offer on any service is not always the fastest or the most stable, so check refill and drop on each listing.
jiangshifen.vip since 2023, no public counter; socialmediagrow.in since 2026, 6.3M orders on its counter. Age comes from the registry record or the web archive and counts towards the Trust Score; a counter that keeps moving counts more than a large frozen one.
jiangshifen.vip: unclaimed, no reviews read, Trust Score 27. socialmediagrow.in: unclaimed, no reviews read, Trust Score 29. socialmediagrow.in has the stronger evidence behind it, and neither figure is a guarantee: start with a small order, check the delivery, and read the reviews behind each rating on the listing.