indianprovider.com vs smmturk.net
Two SMM panels side by side, on the figures we measure — age from the registries, the public price list, the order counter, reviews on named platforms — not on what either says about itself. Updated October 10, 2026.
| 2 panels |
48/ 100 · Fair
|
48/ 100 · Fair
|
|---|---|---|
| Online since | 2021 | 2018 |
| Engine | Perfect Panel | Perfect Panel |
| Services listed | 890 | 908 |
| Lowest price | $0.0012 per 1,000 | $0.0012 per 1,000 |
| Order counter | not shown | 6,589,934 orders |
| Growth, 30 days | — | about 553 a day (+16,584 over 30 days) |
| User rating | no reviews read | no reviews read |
| Review platforms | — | — |
| Owner | unclaimed | unclaimed |
| Reseller API | yes · /api/v2 | yes · /api/v2 |
| Status | online | online |
Prices on shared services
The lowest public rate per 1,000 on services at least two of these panels sell. The cheapest is not always the fastest: refill and drop are on each listing.
Cheapest across 12 rows: indianprovider.com 9 · smmturk.net 3
| Service | ||
|---|---|---|
| Instagram followers | $0.673 | $0.38 |
| Instagram likes | $0.057 | $0.061 |
| Instagram views | $0.0012 | $0.0024 |
| Instagram comments | $0.397 | $2.71 |
| Instagram shares | $0.012 | $0.002 |
| TikTok followers | $1.04 | $1.23 |
| TikTok likes | $0.359 | $0.364 |
| TikTok views | $0.056 | $0.0067 |
| TikTok comments | $6.33 | $7.75 |
| TikTok shares | $0.112 | $0.14 |
| YouTube likes | $0.387 | $1.23 |
| YouTube views | $0.551 | $0.564 |
| YouTube subscribers | $23.01 | $19.00 |
| YouTube comments | $2.94 | $50.23 |
| Telegram views | $0.08 | $0.017 |
| Facebook followers | $0.151 | $0.222 |
| Facebook likes | $0.113 | $0.449 |
| Facebook comments | $2.13 | $28.16 |
| Twitter / X followers | $0.737 | $0.848 |
| Twitter / X likes | $0.737 | $0.868 |
| Twitter / X views | $0.0013 | $0.0012 |
| Twitter / X shares | $0.698 | $0.044 |
| LinkedIn followers | $7.76 | $7.96 |
| LinkedIn comments | $29.63 | $27.40 |
| Reddit likes | $10.49 | $31.20 |
Other comparisons
The nearest panels on the Trust Score to each side, online today.
indianprovider.com against…
indianprovider.com vs smmturk.net: questions and answers
Answers about indianprovider.com vs smmturk.net from what we measured: the order counter, the price list, the registries and the review platforms. Facts last read October 10, 2026.
indianprovider.com and smmturk.net both score 48 of 100 on the Trust Score. smmturk.net is the older of the two, online since 2018; indianprovider.com since 2021. indianprovider.com lists 890 services from $0.0012 per 1,000, smmturk.net 908 from $0.0012. On the 8 services both sell, indianprovider.com is cheaper on 5. smmturk.net shows a public counter — 6.6M orders, about 553 a day (+16,584 over 30 days) — while indianprovider.com shows none. Neither has reviews on the platforms we read. Of the 5 measures compared, smmturk.net leads 4 and indianprovider.com 1. Whichever you choose, start with a small order.
Comparing the lowest public rate per 1,000 on the services both sell — Instagram followers: $0.673 on indianprovider.com against $0.38 on smmturk.net; Instagram likes: $0.057 on indianprovider.com against $0.061 on smmturk.net; Instagram views: $0.0012 on indianprovider.com against $0.0024 on smmturk.net; Instagram comments: $0.397 on indianprovider.com against $2.71 on smmturk.net. indianprovider.com is cheaper on 5 of the 8; the cheapest offer on any service is not always the fastest or the most stable, so check refill and drop on each listing.
indianprovider.com since 2021, no public counter; smmturk.net since 2018, 6.6M orders on its counter. Age comes from the registry record or the web archive and counts towards the Trust Score; a counter that keeps moving counts more than a large frozen one.
indianprovider.com: unclaimed, no reviews read, Trust Score 48. smmturk.net: unclaimed, no reviews read, Trust Score 48. smmturk.net has the stronger evidence behind it, and neither figure is a guarantee: start with a small order, check the delivery, and read the reviews behind each rating on the listing.