igsmm.in vs sosyalmediyam.com
Two SMM panels side by side, on the figures we measure — age from the registries, the public price list, the order counter, reviews on named platforms — not on what either says about itself. Updated October 19, 2026.
| 2 panels |
54/ 100 · Fair
|
47/ 100 · Fair
|
|---|---|---|
| Online since | 2023 | 2021 |
| Engine | Perfect Panel | Perfect Panel |
| Services listed | 584 | 720 |
| Lowest price | $0.0014 per 1,000 | $0.0008 per 1,000 |
| Order counter | 91,034 orders | 1,499,226 orders |
| Growth, 30 days | about 409 a day (+9,416 over 23 days) | about 365 a day (+10,961 over 30 days) |
| User rating | no reviews read | 4.0 of 5 · 1 reviews |
| Review platforms | — | Sitejabber |
| Owner | unclaimed | unclaimed |
| Reseller API | yes · /api/v2 | yes · /api/v2 |
| Status | online | online |
Prices on shared services
The lowest public rate per 1,000 on services at least two of these panels sell. The cheapest is not always the fastest: refill and drop are on each listing.
Cheapest across 12 rows: sosyalmediyam.com 7 · igsmm.in 5
| Service | ||
|---|---|---|
| Instagram followers | $0.213 | $0.051 |
| Instagram likes | $0.041 | $0.04 |
| Instagram views | $0.0018 | $0.0012 |
| Instagram comments | $0.332 | $0.624 |
| Instagram shares | $0.0014 | $0.0008 |
| TikTok followers | $4.11 | $0.99 |
| TikTok likes | $0.691 | $0.041 |
| TikTok views | $0.023 | $0.0032 |
| YouTube likes | $0.249 | $0.448 |
| YouTube views | $0.179 | $0.468 |
| YouTube subscribers | $0.01 | $0.046 |
| YouTube comments | $2.01 | $2.34 |
| Facebook followers | $0.125 | $0.198 |
| Facebook likes | $0.165 | $0.087 |
| Facebook views | $0.019 | $0.021 |
| Facebook comments | $2.19 | $4.42 |
| Twitter / X followers | $2.02 | $0.793 |
| Twitter / X likes | $1.43 | $1.12 |
| Twitter / X views | $0.0015 | $0.0014 |
| Twitter / X shares | $35.37 | $1.27 |
| LinkedIn followers | $4.98 | $15.24 |
| Other followers | $0.568 | $56.54 |
Other comparisons
The nearest panels on the Trust Score to each side, online today.
igsmm.in vs sosyalmediyam.com: questions and answers
Answers about igsmm.in vs sosyalmediyam.com from what we measured: the order counter, the price list, the registries and the review platforms. Facts last read October 19, 2026.
igsmm.in scores 54 of 100 on the Trust Score, sosyalmediyam.com 47 — a 7-point gap. sosyalmediyam.com is the older of the two, online since 2021; igsmm.in since 2023. igsmm.in lists 584 services from $0.0014 per 1,000, sosyalmediyam.com 720 from $0.0008. On the 8 services both sell, sosyalmediyam.com is cheaper on 7. igsmm.in's public counter stands at 91K orders (about 409 a day (+9,416 over 23 days)), sosyalmediyam.com's at 1.5M (about 365 a day (+10,961 over 30 days)). sosyalmediyam.com is rated 4.0 of 5 across 1 reviews on the platforms we read; we found no reviews of igsmm.in there. Of the 7 measures compared, sosyalmediyam.com leads 5 and igsmm.in 2. Whichever you choose, start with a small order.
Comparing the lowest public rate per 1,000 on the services both sell — Instagram followers: $0.213 on igsmm.in against $0.051 on sosyalmediyam.com; Instagram likes: $0.041 on igsmm.in against $0.04 on sosyalmediyam.com; Instagram views: $0.0018 on igsmm.in against $0.0012 on sosyalmediyam.com; Instagram comments: $0.332 on igsmm.in against $0.624 on sosyalmediyam.com. sosyalmediyam.com is cheaper on 7 of the 8; the cheapest offer on any service is not always the fastest or the most stable, so check refill and drop on each listing.
igsmm.in since 2023, 91K orders on its counter; sosyalmediyam.com since 2021, 1.5M orders on its counter. Age comes from the registry record or the web archive and counts towards the Trust Score; a counter that keeps moving counts more than a large frozen one.
igsmm.in: unclaimed, no reviews read, Trust Score 54. sosyalmediyam.com: unclaimed, rated 4.0 across 1 reviews, Trust Score 47. sosyalmediyam.com has the stronger evidence behind it, and neither figure is a guarantee: start with a small order, check the delivery, and read the reviews behind each rating on the listing.