ibabag.com vs instantlikes.us
Two SMM panels side by side, on the figures we measure — age from the registries, the public price list, the order counter, reviews on named platforms — not on what either says about itself. Updated November 2, 2026.
| 2 panels |
29/ 100 · Guarded
|
36/ 100 · Guarded
|
|---|---|---|
| Online since | 2025 | 2024 |
| Engine | Perfect Panel | Perfect Panel |
| Services listed | 213 | 1,314 |
| Lowest price | $0.0017 per 1,000 | $0.0016 per 1,000 |
| Order counter | not shown | 10,733,943 orders |
| Growth, 30 days | — | about 1,317 a day (+39,503 over 30 days) |
| User rating | no reviews read | no reviews read |
| Review platforms | — | — |
| Owner | unclaimed | unclaimed |
| Reseller API | yes · /api/v2 | yes · /api/v2 |
| Status | online | online |
Prices on shared services
The lowest public rate per 1,000 on services at least two of these panels sell. The cheapest is not always the fastest: refill and drop are on each listing.
Cheapest across 12 rows: instantlikes.us 8 · ibabag.com 4
| Service | ||
|---|---|---|
| Instagram followers | $4.08 | $0.90 |
| Instagram likes | $0.14 | $0.09 |
| Instagram views | $0.0017 | $0.0016 |
| Instagram comments | $1.42 | $4.02 |
| Instagram shares | $0.02 | $0.012 |
| TikTok followers | $2.66 | $2.24 |
| TikTok likes | $0.03 | $0.25 |
| TikTok views | $0.03 | $0.038 |
| TikTok comments | $4.42 | $1.69 |
| YouTube likes | $0.30 | $0.24 |
| YouTube views | $0.27 | $0.507 |
| YouTube subscribers | $26.17 | $18.75 |
| YouTube shares | $0.21 | $2.20 |
| Telegram views | $0.02 | $0.01 |
| Telegram members | $1.36 | $0.58 |
| Facebook followers | $0.25 | $0.831 |
| Facebook likes | $0.24 | $0.163 |
| Facebook views | $0.04 | $0.033 |
| Twitter / X followers | $4.07 | $9.56 |
| Twitter / X likes | $3.81 | $2.24 |
| Twitter / X views | $0.01 | $0.03 |
| Twitter / X comments | $225.00 | $12.50 |
| Twitter / X shares | $0.29 | $1.00 |
| Spotify followers | $0.24 | $0.546 |
| Spotify views | $1.62 | $0.546 |
| Discord members | $4.21 | $8.44 |
| Snapchat followers | $13.60 | $29.70 |
| WhatsApp members | $3.36 | $5.06 |
Other comparisons
The nearest panels on the Trust Score to each side, online today.
ibabag.com vs instantlikes.us: questions and answers
Answers about ibabag.com vs instantlikes.us from what we measured: the order counter, the price list, the registries and the review platforms. Facts last read November 2, 2026.
instantlikes.us scores 36 of 100 on the Trust Score, ibabag.com 29 — a 7-point gap. instantlikes.us is the older of the two, online since 2024; ibabag.com since 2025. ibabag.com lists 213 services from $0.0017 per 1,000, instantlikes.us 1,314 from $0.0016. On the 8 services both sell, instantlikes.us is cheaper on 5. instantlikes.us shows a public counter — 11M orders, about 1,317 a day (+39,503 over 30 days) — while ibabag.com shows none. Neither has reviews on the platforms we read. Of the 6 measures compared, instantlikes.us leads 6. Whichever you choose, start with a small order.
Comparing the lowest public rate per 1,000 on the services both sell — Instagram followers: $4.08 on ibabag.com against $0.90 on instantlikes.us; Instagram likes: $0.14 on ibabag.com against $0.09 on instantlikes.us; Instagram views: $0.0017 on ibabag.com against $0.0016 on instantlikes.us; Instagram comments: $1.42 on ibabag.com against $4.02 on instantlikes.us. instantlikes.us is cheaper on 5 of the 8; the cheapest offer on any service is not always the fastest or the most stable, so check refill and drop on each listing.
ibabag.com since 2025, no public counter; instantlikes.us since 2024, 11M orders on its counter. Age comes from the registry record or the web archive and counts towards the Trust Score; a counter that keeps moving counts more than a large frozen one.
ibabag.com: unclaimed, no reviews read, Trust Score 29. instantlikes.us: unclaimed, no reviews read, Trust Score 36. instantlikes.us has the stronger evidence behind it, and neither figure is a guarantee: start with a small order, check the delivery, and read the reviews behind each rating on the listing.