hanumanpanel.shop vs jiangshifen.vip
Two SMM panels side by side, on the figures we measure — age from the registries, the public price list, the order counter, reviews on named platforms — not on what either says about itself. Updated October 25, 2026.
| 2 panels |
27/ 100 · Weak
|
27/ 100 · Weak
|
|---|---|---|
| Online since | 2026 | 2023 |
| Engine | Perfect Panel | Perfect Panel |
| Services listed | 769 | 708 |
| Lowest price | $0.0009 per 1,000 | $0.0029 per 1,000 |
| Order counter | not shown | not shown |
| Growth, 30 days | — | — |
| User rating | 4.8 of 5 · 8 reviews | no reviews read |
| Review platforms | Google, Trustpilot | — |
| Owner | verified | unclaimed |
| Reseller API | yes · /api/v2 | yes · /api/v2 |
| Payment methods | Google Pay, Binance Pay, UPI, Paytm, PhonePe, Razorpay | unknown |
| Status | online | online |
Prices on shared services
The lowest public rate per 1,000 on services at least two of these panels sell. The cheapest is not always the fastest: refill and drop are on each listing.
Cheapest across 12 rows: hanumanpanel.shop 9 · jiangshifen.vip 3
| Service |  hanumanpanel.shop |  jiangshifen.vip |
|---|---|---|
| Instagram followers | $0.29 | $0.985 |
| Instagram comments | $0.775 | $9.13 |
| YouTube views | $0.442 | $4.10 |
| YouTube subscribers | $0.013 | $13.32 |
| YouTube comments | $3.52 | $1.02 |
| Telegram likes | $0.0097 | $0.064 |
| Telegram views | $0.0056 | $0.0047 |
| Telegram members | $0.088 | $0.138 |
| Telegram comments | $3.36 | $3.36 |
| Telegram shares | $0.018 | $0.108 |
| Facebook followers | $0.26 | $0.307 |
| Facebook likes | $0.181 | $0.231 |
| Facebook views | $0.045 | $0.701 |
| Facebook members | $0.459 | $6.05 |
| Facebook comments | $4.16 | $84.76 |
| Twitter / X followers | $1.19 | $1.24 |
| Twitter / X likes | $1.15 | $1.73 |
| Twitter / X views | $0.0025 | $0.0053 |
| WhatsApp followers | $5.09 | $1.73 |
| WhatsApp members | $0.459 | $7.06 |
Other comparisons
The nearest panels on the Trust Score to each side, online today.
hanumanpanel.shop against…
hanumanpanel.shop vs jiangshifen.vip: questions and answers
Answers about hanumanpanel.shop vs jiangshifen.vip from what we measured: the order counter, the price list, the registries and the review platforms. Facts last read October 25, 2026.
hanumanpanel.shop and jiangshifen.vip both score 27 of 100 on the Trust Score. jiangshifen.vip is the older of the two, online since 2023; hanumanpanel.shop since 2026. hanumanpanel.shop lists 769 services from $0.0009 per 1,000, jiangshifen.vip 708 from $0.0029. On the 8 services both sell, hanumanpanel.shop is cheaper on 6. hanumanpanel.shop is rated 4.8 of 5 across 8 reviews on the platforms we read; we found no reviews of jiangshifen.vip there. hanumanpanel.shop's owner has verified the listing on smm.guide; jiangshifen.vip is unclaimed. Of the 4 measures compared, hanumanpanel.shop leads 3 and jiangshifen.vip 1. Whichever you choose, start with a small order.
Comparing the lowest public rate per 1,000 on the services both sell — Instagram followers: $0.29 on hanumanpanel.shop against $0.985 on jiangshifen.vip; Instagram comments: $0.775 on hanumanpanel.shop against $9.13 on jiangshifen.vip; YouTube views: $0.442 on hanumanpanel.shop against $4.10 on jiangshifen.vip; YouTube subscribers: $0.013 on hanumanpanel.shop against $13.32 on jiangshifen.vip. hanumanpanel.shop is cheaper on 6 of the 8; the cheapest offer on any service is not always the fastest or the most stable, so check refill and drop on each listing.
hanumanpanel.shop since 2026, no public counter; jiangshifen.vip since 2023, no public counter. Age comes from the registry record or the web archive and counts towards the Trust Score; a counter that keeps moving counts more than a large frozen one.
hanumanpanel.shop: owner verified, rated 4.8 across 8 reviews, Trust Score 27. jiangshifen.vip: unclaimed, no reviews read, Trust Score 27. hanumanpanel.shop has the stronger evidence behind it, and neither figure is a guarantee: start with a small order, check the delivery, and read the reviews behind each rating on the listing.