g1618.com vs instantlikes.us
Two SMM panels side by side, on the figures we measure — age from the registries, the public price list, the order counter, reviews on named platforms — not on what either says about itself. Updated November 3, 2026.
| 2 panels |
29/ 100 · Guarded
|
36/ 100 · Guarded
|
|---|---|---|
| Online since | 2025 | 2024 |
| Engine | Perfect Panel | Perfect Panel |
| Services listed | 700 | 1,315 |
| Lowest price | $0.0006 per 1,000 | $0.0016 per 1,000 |
| Order counter | not shown | 10,735,833 orders |
| Growth, 30 days | — | about 1,350 a day (+40,505 over 30 days) |
| User rating | no reviews read | no reviews read |
| Review platforms | — | — |
| Owner | unclaimed | unclaimed |
| Reseller API | yes · /api/v2 | yes · /api/v2 |
| Status | online | online |
Prices on shared services
The lowest public rate per 1,000 on services at least two of these panels sell. The cheapest is not always the fastest: refill and drop are on each listing.
Cheapest across 12 rows: g1618.com 10 · instantlikes.us 2
| Service |  g1618.com |  instantlikes.us |
|---|---|---|
| Instagram followers | $0.47 | $0.90 |
| Instagram likes | $0.091 | $0.09 |
| Instagram views | $0.0006 | $0.0016 |
| Instagram members | $1.10 | $2.20 |
| Instagram comments | $0.35 | $4.02 |
| Instagram shares | $0.0006 | $0.012 |
| TikTok followers | $0.65 | $2.24 |
| TikTok likes | $0.07 | $0.25 |
| TikTok views | $0.0026 | $0.038 |
| TikTok comments | $0.75 | $1.69 |
| TikTok shares | $0.089 | $0.065 |
| YouTube likes | $0.176 | $0.24 |
| YouTube views | $0.24 | $0.507 |
| YouTube subscribers | $0.04 | $18.75 |
| YouTube comments | $1.10 | $10.30 |
| YouTube shares | $0.16 | $2.20 |
| Telegram likes | $0.012 | $0.014 |
| Telegram views | $0.002 | $0.01 |
| Telegram members | $0.032 | $0.58 |
| Facebook followers | $0.112 | $0.831 |
| Facebook likes | $0.074 | $0.163 |
| Facebook views | $0.016 | $0.033 |
| Facebook comments | $0.50 | $10.00 |
| Twitter / X followers | $0.637 | $7.50 |
| Twitter / X likes | $0.85 | $2.24 |
| Twitter / X views | $0.0007 | $0.03 |
| Twitter / X shares | $1.00 | $1.00 |
| Kwai likes | $0.15 | $0.354 |
| Other likes | $0.01 | $0.45 |
Other comparisons
The nearest panels on the Trust Score to each side, online today.
g1618.com vs instantlikes.us: questions and answers
Answers about g1618.com vs instantlikes.us from what we measured: the order counter, the price list, the registries and the review platforms. Facts last read November 3, 2026.
instantlikes.us scores 36 of 100 on the Trust Score, g1618.com 29 — a 7-point gap. instantlikes.us is the older of the two, online since 2024; g1618.com since 2025. g1618.com lists 700 services from $0.0006 per 1,000, instantlikes.us 1,315 from $0.0016. On the 8 services both sell, g1618.com is cheaper on 7. instantlikes.us shows a public counter — 11M orders, about 1,350 a day (+40,505 over 30 days) — while g1618.com shows none. Neither has reviews on the platforms we read. Of the 6 measures compared, instantlikes.us leads 5 and g1618.com 1. Whichever you choose, start with a small order.
Comparing the lowest public rate per 1,000 on the services both sell — Instagram followers: $0.47 on g1618.com against $0.90 on instantlikes.us; Instagram likes: $0.091 on g1618.com against $0.09 on instantlikes.us; Instagram views: $0.0006 on g1618.com against $0.0016 on instantlikes.us; Instagram members: $1.10 on g1618.com against $2.20 on instantlikes.us. g1618.com is cheaper on 7 of the 8; the cheapest offer on any service is not always the fastest or the most stable, so check refill and drop on each listing.
g1618.com since 2025, no public counter; instantlikes.us since 2024, 11M orders on its counter. Age comes from the registry record or the web archive and counts towards the Trust Score; a counter that keeps moving counts more than a large frozen one.
g1618.com: unclaimed, no reviews read, Trust Score 29. instantlikes.us: unclaimed, no reviews read, Trust Score 36. instantlikes.us has the stronger evidence behind it, and neither figure is a guarantee: start with a small order, check the delivery, and read the reviews behind each rating on the listing.