foolloo.com vs rajabooster.com
Two SMM panels side by side, on the figures we measure — age from the registries, the public price list, the order counter, reviews on named platforms — not on what either says about itself. Updated November 2, 2026.
| 2 panels |
28/ 100 · Guarded
|
28/ 100 · Guarded
|
|---|---|---|
| Online since | 2025 | 2023 |
| Engine | Perfect Panel | Perfect Panel |
| Services listed | 5,321 | 1,642 |
| Lowest price | $0.01 per 1,000 | $0.001 per 1,000 |
| Order counter | not shown | not shown |
| Growth, 30 days | — | — |
| User rating | 3.5 of 5 · 1 reviews | no reviews read |
| Review platforms | Trustpilot | — |
| Owner | unclaimed | unclaimed |
| Reseller API | yes · /api/v2 | yes · /api/v2 |
| Status | online | online |
Prices on shared services
The lowest public rate per 1,000 on services at least two of these panels sell. The cheapest is not always the fastest: refill and drop are on each listing.
Cheapest across 12 rows: foolloo.com 6 · rajabooster.com 6
| Service |  foolloo.com |  rajabooster.com |
|---|---|---|
| Instagram followers | $0.25 | $0.377 |
| Instagram likes | $0.09 | $0.051 |
| Instagram views | $0.01 | $0.0012 |
| Instagram comments | $0.42 | $0.476 |
| Instagram shares | $0.02 | $0.001 |
| TikTok followers | $1.21 | $0.693 |
| TikTok likes | $0.03 | $0.077 |
| TikTok views | $0.01 | $0.0062 |
| TikTok comments | $0.28 | $0.998 |
| TikTok shares | $0.06 | $0.144 |
| YouTube likes | $0.42 | $0.317 |
| YouTube views | $0.29 | $1.09 |
| YouTube subscribers | $0.07 | $47.56 |
| YouTube comments | $2.34 | $2.01 |
| Telegram likes | $0.05 | $0.014 |
| Telegram views | $0.01 | $0.0023 |
| Telegram members | $0.13 | $0.345 |
| Facebook followers | $0.20 | $0.182 |
| Facebook likes | $0.12 | $0.121 |
| Facebook views | $0.01 | $0.029 |
| Facebook members | $0.30 | $0.25 |
| Facebook comments | $2.33 | $0.718 |
| Facebook shares | $1.23 | $0.159 |
| Twitter / X followers | $0.42 | $1.76 |
| Twitter / X likes | $0.13 | $1.11 |
| Twitter / X views | $0.01 | $0.0018 |
| Twitter / X comments | $27.50 | $42.70 |
| Spotify followers | $0.24 | $0.359 |
| Twitch followers | $0.09 | $0.119 |
| WhatsApp members | $6.88 | $0.307 |
Other comparisons
The nearest panels on the Trust Score to each side, online today.
foolloo.com vs rajabooster.com: questions and answers
Answers about foolloo.com vs rajabooster.com from what we measured: the order counter, the price list, the registries and the review platforms. Facts last read November 2, 2026.
foolloo.com and rajabooster.com both score 28 of 100 on the Trust Score. rajabooster.com is the older of the two, online since 2023; foolloo.com since 2025. foolloo.com lists 5,321 services from $0.01 per 1,000, rajabooster.com 1,642 from $0.001. On the 8 services both sell, rajabooster.com is cheaper on 5. foolloo.com is rated 3.5 of 5 across 1 reviews on the platforms we read; we found no reviews of rajabooster.com there. The measures split evenly between the two — try a small order on each and compare the delivery.
Comparing the lowest public rate per 1,000 on the services both sell — Instagram followers: $0.25 on foolloo.com against $0.377 on rajabooster.com; Instagram likes: $0.09 on foolloo.com against $0.051 on rajabooster.com; Instagram views: $0.01 on foolloo.com against $0.0012 on rajabooster.com; Instagram comments: $0.42 on foolloo.com against $0.476 on rajabooster.com. rajabooster.com is cheaper on 5 of the 8; the cheapest offer on any service is not always the fastest or the most stable, so check refill and drop on each listing.
foolloo.com since 2025, no public counter; rajabooster.com since 2023, no public counter. Age comes from the registry record or the web archive and counts towards the Trust Score; a counter that keeps moving counts more than a large frozen one.
foolloo.com: unclaimed, rated 3.5 across 1 reviews, Trust Score 28. rajabooster.com: unclaimed, no reviews read, Trust Score 28. The evidence is even, and neither figure is a guarantee: start with a small order, check the delivery, and read the reviews behind each rating on the listing.