Home / Compare / followers-cheap.store vs trend-smm.com

followers-cheap.store vs trend-smm.com

Two SMM panels side by side, on the figures we measure — age from the registries, the public price list, the order counter, reviews on named platforms — not on what either says about itself. Updated September 7, 2026.

Trust Score
45 / 100 · Fair
45 / 100 · Fair
Online since
2022
2024
Engine
Perfect Panel
Perfect Panel
Services listed
212
361
Lowest price
$0.0026 per 1,000
$0.01 per 1,000
Order counter
not shown
9,164 orders
Growth, 30 days
+5 orders in 5 days, about 1 a day
User rating
3.5 of 5 · 9 reviews
no reviews read
Review platforms
Trustpilot
Owner
unclaimed
unclaimed
Reseller API
yes
yes
Status
online
online
Open followers-cheap.store Open trend-smm.com the better figure of the two

Verdict

followers-cheap.store and trend-smm.com both score 45 of 100 on the Trust Score. followers-cheap.store is the older of the two, online since 2022; trend-smm.com since 2024. followers-cheap.store lists 212 services from $0.0026 per 1,000, trend-smm.com 361 from $0.01. On the 8 services both sell, followers-cheap.store is cheaper on 5. trend-smm.com shows a public counter — 9,164 orders, +5 orders in 5 days, about 1 a day — while followers-cheap.store shows none. followers-cheap.store is rated 3.5 of 5 across 9 reviews on the platforms we read; we found no reviews of trend-smm.com there. On the figures it is a draw — try a small order on each and compare the delivery.

Prices on the services both sell

The lowest public rate per 1,000 for each service, in US dollars at the day's rate. Cheapest is not always fastest — refill and drop stand on each listing.

Service
followers-cheap.store
trend-smm.com
Instagram followers
$0.26
$4.32
Instagram likes
$0.06
$0.13
Instagram views
$0.0026
$0.01
Instagram comments
$0.80
$8.46
Instagram shares
$0.873
$0.04
TikTok followers
$3.38
$1.91
TikTok likes
$0.082
$52.82
TikTok views
$0.086
$0.05

Other comparisons

The nearest panels on the Trust Score to each side, online today.

followers-cheap.store vs trend-smm.com: questions and answers

Straight answers about followers-cheap.store vs trend-smm.com, built from what we measured — the counter, the price list, the registries and the review platforms. Updated September 7, 2026.

followers-cheap.store and trend-smm.com both score 45 of 100 on the Trust Score. followers-cheap.store is the older of the two, online since 2022; trend-smm.com since 2024. followers-cheap.store lists 212 services from $0.0026 per 1,000, trend-smm.com 361 from $0.01. On the 8 services both sell, followers-cheap.store is cheaper on 5. trend-smm.com shows a public counter — 9,164 orders, +5 orders in 5 days, about 1 a day — while followers-cheap.store shows none. followers-cheap.store is rated 3.5 of 5 across 9 reviews on the platforms we read; we found no reviews of trend-smm.com there. On the figures it is a draw — try a small order on each and compare the delivery.

Comparing the lowest public rate per 1,000 on the services both sell — Instagram followers: $0.26 on followers-cheap.store against $4.32 on trend-smm.com; Instagram likes: $0.06 on followers-cheap.store against $0.13 on trend-smm.com; Instagram views: $0.0026 on followers-cheap.store against $0.01 on trend-smm.com; Instagram comments: $0.80 on followers-cheap.store against $8.46 on trend-smm.com. followers-cheap.store is cheaper on 5 of the 8; the cheapest offer on any service is not always the fastest or the most stable, so check refill and drop on each listing.

followers-cheap.store since 2022, no public counter; trend-smm.com since 2024, 9,164 orders on its counter. Age comes from the registry record or the web archive and counts towards the Trust Score; a counter that keeps moving counts more than a large frozen one.

followers-cheap.store: unclaimed, rated 3.5 across 9 reviews, Trust Score 45. trend-smm.com: unclaimed, no reviews read, Trust Score 45. The evidence is even, and neither figure is a guarantee: start with a small order, check the delivery, and read the reviews behind each rating on the listing.