followers-cheap.store vs smmvex.com
Two SMM panels side by side, on the figures we measure — age from the registries, the public price list, the order counter, reviews on named platforms — not on what either says about itself. Updated October 25, 2026.
| 2 panels |
31/ 100 · Guarded
|
31/ 100 · Guarded
|
|---|---|---|
| Online since | 2022 | 2026 |
| Engine | Perfect Panel | Perfect Panel |
| Services listed | 194 | 592 |
| Lowest price | $0.0026 per 1,000 | $0.01 per 1,000 |
| Order counter | not shown | 5,836,203 orders |
| Growth, 30 days | — | no growth read |
| User rating | 3.5 of 5 · 9 reviews | no reviews read |
| Review platforms | Trustpilot | — |
| Owner | unclaimed | unclaimed |
| Reseller API | yes · /api/v2 | yes · /api/v2 |
| Status | online | online |
Prices on shared services
The lowest public rate per 1,000 on services at least two of these panels sell. The cheapest is not always the fastest: refill and drop are on each listing.
Cheapest across 12 rows: followers-cheap.store 6 · smmvex.com 6
| Service | ||
|---|---|---|
| Instagram followers | $0.26 | $0.76 |
| Instagram likes | $0.06 | $0.20 |
| Instagram views | $0.0026 | $0.01 |
| Instagram comments | $0.80 | $0.52 |
| Instagram shares | $0.873 | $0.02 |
| TikTok followers | $3.38 | $3.24 |
| TikTok likes | $0.082 | $2.16 |
| TikTok comments | $6.92 | $5.40 |
| TikTok shares | $0.13 | $5.40 |
| YouTube likes | $3.80 | $0.51 |
| YouTube views | $0.104 | $0.45 |
| YouTube subscribers | $30.77 | $5.63 |
| YouTube comments | $6.00 | $5.63 |
| Telegram likes | $0.048 | $0.02 |
| Telegram views | $0.013 | $0.01 |
| Telegram members | $1.25 | $0.25 |
| Facebook followers | $0.305 | $5.63 |
| Facebook views | $0.041 | $0.12 |
| Facebook comments | $3.48 | $5.63 |
| Twitter / X followers | $7.00 | $5.63 |
| Twitter / X likes | $3.24 | $3.38 |
| Twitter / X views | $0.008 | $0.03 |
| Threads followers | $12.00 | $4.50 |
| LinkedIn followers | $22.00 | $5.63 |
| WhatsApp followers | $3.70 | $9.00 |
| Kick followers | $1.68 | $5.63 |
Other comparisons
The nearest panels on the Trust Score to each side, online today.
followers-cheap.store against…
followers-cheap.store vs smmvex.com: questions and answers
Answers about followers-cheap.store vs smmvex.com from what we measured: the order counter, the price list, the registries and the review platforms. Facts last read October 25, 2026.
followers-cheap.store and smmvex.com both score 31 of 100 on the Trust Score. followers-cheap.store is the older of the two, online since 2022; smmvex.com since 2026. followers-cheap.store lists 194 services from $0.0026 per 1,000, smmvex.com 592 from $0.01. On the 8 services both sell, neither is cheaper overall. smmvex.com shows a public counter — 5.8M orders — while followers-cheap.store shows none. followers-cheap.store is rated 3.5 of 5 across 9 reviews on the platforms we read; we found no reviews of smmvex.com there. The measures split evenly between the two — try a small order on each and compare the delivery.
Comparing the lowest public rate per 1,000 on the services both sell — Instagram followers: $0.26 on followers-cheap.store against $0.76 on smmvex.com; Instagram likes: $0.06 on followers-cheap.store against $0.20 on smmvex.com; Instagram views: $0.0026 on followers-cheap.store against $0.01 on smmvex.com; Instagram comments: $0.80 on followers-cheap.store against $0.52 on smmvex.com. Neither is cheaper overall; the cheapest offer on any service is not always the fastest or the most stable, so check refill and drop on each listing.
followers-cheap.store since 2022, no public counter; smmvex.com since 2026, 5.8M orders on its counter. Age comes from the registry record or the web archive and counts towards the Trust Score; a counter that keeps moving counts more than a large frozen one.
followers-cheap.store: unclaimed, rated 3.5 across 9 reviews, Trust Score 31. smmvex.com: unclaimed, no reviews read, Trust Score 31. The evidence is even, and neither figure is a guarantee: start with a small order, check the delivery, and read the reviews behind each rating on the listing.