fans1688.com vs fensiduoduo.com
Two SMM panels side by side, on the figures we measure — age from the registries, the public price list, the order counter, reviews on named platforms — not on what either says about itself. Updated October 7, 2026.
| 2 panels |
33/ 100 · Guarded
|
32/ 100 · Guarded
|
|---|---|---|
| Online since | 2022 | 2021 |
| Engine | Perfect Panel | Perfect Panel |
| Services listed | 300 | 387 |
| Lowest price | $0.0045 per 1,000 | $0.0011 per 1,000 |
| Order counter | not shown | not shown |
| Growth, 30 days | — | — |
| User rating | 3.0 of 5 · 1,688 reviews | no reviews read |
| Review platforms | Trustpilot | — |
| Owner | unclaimed | unclaimed |
| Reseller API | yes · /api/v2 | yes · /api/v2 |
| Status | online | online |
Prices on shared services
The lowest public rate per 1,000 on services at least two of these panels sell. The cheapest is not always the fastest: refill and drop are on each listing.
Cheapest across 12 rows: fensiduoduo.com 8 · fans1688.com 4
| Service |  fans1688.com |  fensiduoduo.com |
|---|---|---|
| Instagram followers | $2.53 | $0.501 |
| Instagram likes | $0.121 | $0.064 |
| Instagram views | $0.0089 | $0.0011 |
| Instagram comments | $7.24 | $4.69 |
| Instagram shares | $0.13 | $0.043 |
| TikTok followers | $3.07 | $2.27 |
| TikTok likes | $0.057 | $0.437 |
| TikTok views | $0.022 | $0.128 |
| TikTok shares | $0.277 | $0.192 |
| YouTube likes | $2.50 | $0.502 |
| YouTube views | $0.803 | $0.906 |
| YouTube subscribers | $0.092 | $16.55 |
| YouTube comments | $6.69 | $6.98 |
| Telegram likes | $0.092 | $0.0086 |
| Telegram views | $0.0075 | $0.032 |
| Telegram members | $0.413 | $0.128 |
| Facebook followers | $0.645 | $0.192 |
| Facebook likes | $0.856 | $0.617 |
| Facebook comments | $12.48 | $15.08 |
| Twitter / X followers | $1.11 | $4.88 |
| Twitter / X likes | $1.46 | $2.14 |
| Twitter / X views | $0.006 | $0.0043 |
Other comparisons
The nearest panels on the Trust Score to each side, online today.
fans1688.com against…
fans1688.com vs fensiduoduo.com: questions and answers
Answers about fans1688.com vs fensiduoduo.com from what we measured: the order counter, the price list, the registries and the review platforms. Facts last read October 7, 2026.
fans1688.com scores 33 of 100 on the Trust Score, fensiduoduo.com 32 — a 1-point gap. fensiduoduo.com is the older of the two, online since 2021; fans1688.com since 2022. fans1688.com lists 300 services from $0.0045 per 1,000, fensiduoduo.com 387 from $0.0011. On the 8 services both sell, fensiduoduo.com is cheaper on 6. fans1688.com is rated 3.0 of 5 across 1,688 reviews on the platforms we read; we found no reviews of fensiduoduo.com there. Of the 5 measures compared, fensiduoduo.com leads 3 and fans1688.com 2. Whichever you choose, start with a small order.
Comparing the lowest public rate per 1,000 on the services both sell — Instagram followers: $2.53 on fans1688.com against $0.501 on fensiduoduo.com; Instagram likes: $0.121 on fans1688.com against $0.064 on fensiduoduo.com; Instagram views: $0.0089 on fans1688.com against $0.0011 on fensiduoduo.com; Instagram comments: $7.24 on fans1688.com against $4.69 on fensiduoduo.com. fensiduoduo.com is cheaper on 6 of the 8; the cheapest offer on any service is not always the fastest or the most stable, so check refill and drop on each listing.
fans1688.com since 2022, no public counter; fensiduoduo.com since 2021, no public counter. Age comes from the registry record or the web archive and counts towards the Trust Score; a counter that keeps moving counts more than a large frozen one.
fans1688.com: unclaimed, rated 3.0 across 1,688 reviews, Trust Score 33. fensiduoduo.com: unclaimed, no reviews read, Trust Score 32. fensiduoduo.com has the stronger evidence behind it, and neither figure is a guarantee: start with a small order, check the delivery, and read the reviews behind each rating on the listing.