famsup.com vs followercomments.com
Two SMM panels side by side, on the figures we measure — age from the registries, the public price list, the order counter, reviews on named platforms — not on what either says about itself. Updated November 14, 2026.
| 2 panels |
31/ 100 · Guarded
|
33/ 100 · Guarded
|
|---|---|---|
| Online since | 2022 | 2024 |
| Engine | Perfect Panel | Perfect Panel |
| Services listed | 238 | 272 |
| Lowest price | $0.0096 per 1,000 | $0.01 per 1,000 |
| Order counter | not shown | 3,943 orders |
| Growth, 30 days | — | about 4 a day (+129 over 30 days) |
| User rating | 3.0 of 5 · 2 reviews | no reviews read |
| Review platforms | Trustpilot | — |
| Owner | unclaimed | unclaimed |
| Reseller API | yes · /api/v2 | yes · /api/v2 |
| Status | online | online |
Prices on shared services
The lowest public rate per 1,000 on services at least two of these panels sell. The cheapest is not always the fastest: refill and drop are on each listing.
Cheapest across 12 rows: followercomments.com 7 · famsup.com 5
| Service |  famsup.com |  followercomments.com |
|---|---|---|
| Instagram followers | $1.67 | $9.57 |
| Instagram likes | $0.209 | $0.229 |
| Instagram views | $0.014 | $0.01 |
| Instagram shares | $8.13 | $1.44 |
| TikTok followers | $4.21 | $13.68 |
| TikTok likes | $1.59 | $1.98 |
| TikTok views | $0.169 | $0.039 |
| TikTok shares | $0.057 | $2.24 |
| YouTube likes | $10.35 | $1.55 |
| YouTube views | $3.18 | $2.27 |
| YouTube subscribers | $14.79 | $7.94 |
| YouTube comments | $14.79 | $9.17 |
| YouTube shares | $2.75 | $216.20 |
| Twitter / X likes | $2.16 | $11.97 |
| Twitter / X comments | $11.83 | $105.78 |
| Twitter / X shares | $2.57 | $109.08 |
| Spotify followers | $1.19 | $0.33 |
| LinkedIn followers | $10.35 | $60.49 |
| LinkedIn likes | $8.87 | $8.37 |
| LinkedIn comments | $10.35 | $42.88 |
| LinkedIn shares | $7.39 | $145.16 |
| Other comments | $8.13 | $178.68 |
Other comparisons
The nearest panels on the Trust Score to each side, online today.
famsup.com against…
famsup.com vs followercomments.com: questions and answers
Answers about famsup.com vs followercomments.com from what we measured: the order counter, the price list, the registries and the review platforms. Facts last read November 14, 2026.
followercomments.com scores 33 of 100 on the Trust Score, famsup.com 31 — a 2-point gap. famsup.com is the older of the two, online since 2022; followercomments.com since 2024. famsup.com lists 238 services from $0.0096 per 1,000, followercomments.com 272 from $0.01. On the 8 services both sell, famsup.com is cheaper on 5. followercomments.com shows a public counter — 3,943 orders, about 4 a day (+129 over 30 days) — while famsup.com shows none. famsup.com is rated 3.0 of 5 across 2 reviews on the platforms we read; we found no reviews of followercomments.com there. Of the 7 measures compared, followercomments.com leads 4 and famsup.com 3. Whichever you choose, start with a small order.
Comparing the lowest public rate per 1,000 on the services both sell — Instagram followers: $1.67 on famsup.com against $9.57 on followercomments.com; Instagram likes: $0.209 on famsup.com against $0.229 on followercomments.com; Instagram views: $0.014 on famsup.com against $0.01 on followercomments.com; Instagram shares: $8.13 on famsup.com against $1.44 on followercomments.com. famsup.com is cheaper on 5 of the 8; the cheapest offer on any service is not always the fastest or the most stable, so check refill and drop on each listing.
famsup.com since 2022, no public counter; followercomments.com since 2024, 3,943 orders on its counter. Age comes from the registry record or the web archive and counts towards the Trust Score; a counter that keeps moving counts more than a large frozen one.
famsup.com: unclaimed, rated 3.0 across 2 reviews, Trust Score 31. followercomments.com: unclaimed, no reviews read, Trust Score 33. followercomments.com has the stronger evidence behind it, and neither figure is a guarantee: start with a small order, check the delivery, and read the reviews behind each rating on the listing.