Home / Compare / dkstudio.net vs pikasmm.com

dkstudio.net vs pikasmm.com

Two SMM panels side by side, on the figures we measure — age from the registries, the public price list, the order counter, reviews on named platforms — not on what either says about itself. Updated October 10, 2026.

2 panels
35/ 100 · Guarded
35/ 100 · Guarded
Online since 20192024
Engine Perfect PanelPerfect Panel
Services listed behind a loginbehind a login
Lowest price ——
Order counter not shown5,065,688 orders
Growth, 30 days —about 296 a day (+5,920 over 20 days)
User rating no reviews readno reviews read
Review platforms ——
Owner unclaimedunclaimed
Reseller API yes · /api/v2yes · /api/v2
Status offlineonline
the best figure in the rowUpdated October 10, 2026

Other comparisons

The nearest panels on the Trust Score to each side, online today.

dkstudio.net vs pikasmm.com: questions and answers

Answers about dkstudio.net vs pikasmm.com from what we measured: the order counter, the price list, the registries and the review platforms. Facts last read October 10, 2026.

dkstudio.net and pikasmm.com both score 35 of 100 on the Trust Score. dkstudio.net is the older of the two, online since 2019; pikasmm.com since 2024. pikasmm.com shows a public counter — 5.1M orders, about 296 a day (+5,920 over 20 days) — while dkstudio.net shows none. Neither has reviews on the platforms we read. Of the 3 measures compared, pikasmm.com leads 2 and dkstudio.net 1. Whichever you choose, start with a small order.

dkstudio.net since 2019, no public counter; pikasmm.com since 2024, 5.1M orders on its counter. Age comes from the registry record or the web archive and counts towards the Trust Score; a counter that keeps moving counts more than a large frozen one.

dkstudio.net: unclaimed, no reviews read, Trust Score 35. pikasmm.com: unclaimed, no reviews read, Trust Score 35. pikasmm.com has the stronger evidence behind it, and neither figure is a guarantee: start with a small order, check the delivery, and read the reviews behind each rating on the listing.