Home / Compare / divulga.vip vs medyamarketim.net

divulga.vip vs medyamarketim.net

Two SMM panels side by side, on the figures we measure — age from the registries, the public price list, the order counter, reviews on named platforms — not on what either says about itself. Updated October 19, 2026.

2 panels
34/ 100 · Guarded
32/ 100 · Guarded
Online since 20202023
Engine Perfect PanelPerfect Panel
Services listed behind a loginbehind a login
Lowest price ——
Order counter not shown4,327,852 orders
Growth, 30 days —no growth read
User rating no reviews readno reviews read
Review platforms ——
Owner unclaimedunclaimed
Reseller API yes · /api/v2yes · /api/v2
Status onlineoffline
the best figure in the rowUpdated October 19, 2026

Other comparisons

The nearest panels on the Trust Score to each side, online today.

divulga.vip vs medyamarketim.net: questions and answers

Answers about divulga.vip vs medyamarketim.net from what we measured: the order counter, the price list, the registries and the review platforms. Facts last read October 19, 2026.

divulga.vip scores 34 of 100 on the Trust Score, medyamarketim.net 32 — a 2-point gap. divulga.vip is the older of the two, online since 2020; medyamarketim.net since 2023. medyamarketim.net shows a public counter — 4.3M orders — while divulga.vip shows none. Neither has reviews on the platforms we read. Of the 3 measures compared, divulga.vip leads 2 and medyamarketim.net 1. Whichever you choose, start with a small order.

divulga.vip since 2020, no public counter; medyamarketim.net since 2023, 4.3M orders on its counter. Age comes from the registry record or the web archive and counts towards the Trust Score; a counter that keeps moving counts more than a large frozen one.

divulga.vip: unclaimed, no reviews read, Trust Score 34. medyamarketim.net: unclaimed, no reviews read, Trust Score 32. divulga.vip has the stronger evidence behind it, and neither figure is a guarantee: start with a small order, check the delivery, and read the reviews behind each rating on the listing.