crazypanel.com vs viralnowmarketing.com
Two SMM panels side by side, on the figures we measure — age from the registries, the public price list, the order counter, reviews on named platforms — not on what either says about itself. Updated October 12, 2026.
| 2 panels |
47/ 100 · Fair
|
47/ 100 · Fair
|
|---|---|---|
| Online since | 2024 | 2021 |
| Engine | Perfect Panel | Perfect Panel |
| Services listed | 4,245 | 236 |
| Lowest price | $0.0008 per 1,000 | $0.04 per 1,000 |
| Order counter | 578,926 orders | not shown |
| Growth, 30 days | about 2,452 a day (+73,549 over 30 days) | — |
| User rating | no reviews read | no reviews read |
| Review platforms | — | — |
| Owner | unclaimed | unclaimed |
| Reseller API | yes · /api/v2 | yes · /api/v2 |
| Status | online | offline |
Prices on shared services
The lowest public rate per 1,000 on services at least two of these panels sell. The cheapest is not always the fastest: refill and drop are on each listing.
Cheapest across 12 rows: crazypanel.com 12
| Service | ||
|---|---|---|
| Instagram followers | $0.189 | $42.22 |
| Instagram likes | $0.036 | $0.66 |
| Instagram views | $0.0008 | $0.48 |
| Instagram comments | $0.163 | $8.03 |
| Instagram shares | $0.303 | $0.75 |
| TikTok followers | $0.137 | $4.65 |
| TikTok likes | $0.016 | $1.25 |
| TikTok views | $0.0022 | $0.35 |
| TikTok comments | $0.682 | $29.37 |
| TikTok shares | $0.013 | $0.66 |
| YouTube likes | $0.128 | $2.77 |
| YouTube views | $0.09 | $1.28 |
| YouTube subscribers | $0.012 | $30.79 |
| YouTube comments | $1.26 | $7.20 |
| YouTube shares | $0.188 | $2.25 |
| Telegram likes | $0.0095 | $0.24 |
| Telegram views | $0.0016 | $0.33 |
| Telegram members | $0.013 | $2.52 |
| Facebook followers | $0.106 | $20.03 |
| Facebook likes | $0.067 | $1.19 |
| Facebook views | $0.0055 | $0.04 |
| Facebook comments | $0.631 | $60.00 |
| Twitter / X followers | $3.29 | $64.32 |
| Twitter / X likes | $1.22 | $8.68 |
Other comparisons
The nearest panels on the Trust Score to each side, online today.
crazypanel.com against…
crazypanel.com vs viralnowmarketing.com: questions and answers
Answers about crazypanel.com vs viralnowmarketing.com from what we measured: the order counter, the price list, the registries and the review platforms. Facts last read October 12, 2026.
crazypanel.com and viralnowmarketing.com both score 47 of 100 on the Trust Score. viralnowmarketing.com is the older of the two, online since 2021; crazypanel.com since 2024. crazypanel.com lists 4,245 services from $0.0008 per 1,000, viralnowmarketing.com 236 from $0.04. On the 8 services both sell, crazypanel.com is cheaper on 8. crazypanel.com shows a public counter — 579K orders, about 2,452 a day (+73,549 over 30 days) — while viralnowmarketing.com shows none. Neither has reviews on the platforms we read. Of the 5 measures compared, crazypanel.com leads 4 and viralnowmarketing.com 1. Whichever you choose, start with a small order.
Comparing the lowest public rate per 1,000 on the services both sell — Instagram followers: $0.189 on crazypanel.com against $42.22 on viralnowmarketing.com; Instagram likes: $0.036 on crazypanel.com against $0.66 on viralnowmarketing.com; Instagram views: $0.0008 on crazypanel.com against $0.48 on viralnowmarketing.com; Instagram comments: $0.163 on crazypanel.com against $8.03 on viralnowmarketing.com. crazypanel.com is cheaper on 8 of the 8; the cheapest offer on any service is not always the fastest or the most stable, so check refill and drop on each listing.
crazypanel.com since 2024, 579K orders on its counter; viralnowmarketing.com since 2021, no public counter. Age comes from the registry record or the web archive and counts towards the Trust Score; a counter that keeps moving counts more than a large frozen one.
crazypanel.com: unclaimed, no reviews read, Trust Score 47. viralnowmarketing.com: unclaimed, no reviews read, Trust Score 47. crazypanel.com has the stronger evidence behind it, and neither figure is a guarantee: start with a small order, check the delivery, and read the reviews behind each rating on the listing.