chinayinliu.com vs swiftsmmpanel.com
Two SMM panels side by side, on the figures we measure — age from the registries, the public price list, the order counter, reviews on named platforms — not on what either says about itself. Updated October 15, 2026.
| 2 panels |
50/ 100 · Fair
|
50/ 100 · Fair
|
|---|---|---|
| Online since | 2022 | 2024 |
| Engine | Perfect Panel | Perfect Panel |
| Services listed | 721 | 3,434 |
| Lowest price | $0.01 per 1,000 | $0.0006 per 1,000 |
| Order counter | 555,318,360 orders | 299,551 orders |
| Growth, 30 days | about 51,838 a day (+1,555,131 over 30 days) | about 1,756 a day (+52,694 over 30 days) |
| User rating | no reviews read | no reviews read |
| Review platforms | — | — |
| Owner | verified | unclaimed |
| Reseller API | yes · /api/v2 | yes · /api/v2 |
| Status | online | online |
Prices on shared services
The lowest public rate per 1,000 on services at least two of these panels sell. The cheapest is not always the fastest: refill and drop are on each listing.
Cheapest across 12 rows: swiftsmmpanel.com 12
| Service |  chinayinliu.com |  swiftsmmpanel.com |
|---|---|---|
| Instagram followers | $4.66 | $0.169 |
| Instagram likes | $0.37 | $0.043 |
| Instagram views | $0.08 | $0.0007 |
| Instagram comments | $18.19 | $0.468 |
| YouTube likes | $2.46 | $0.156 |
| YouTube views | $4.71 | $0.333 |
| YouTube subscribers | $277.01 | $0.081 |
| Telegram likes | $0.51 | $0.013 |
| Telegram views | $0.01 | $0.0016 |
| Telegram members | $1.18 | $0.012 |
| Telegram comments | $11.40 | $2.34 |
| Telegram shares | $0.22 | $0.016 |
| Twitter / X followers | $8.25 | $0.487 |
| Twitter / X likes | $12.34 | $0.146 |
| Twitter / X views | $0.05 | $0.001 |
| Twitter / X comments | $227.22 | $32.50 |
| WhatsApp likes | $11.80 | $1.17 |
| WhatsApp members | $43.80 | $2.47 |
Other comparisons
The nearest panels on the Trust Score to each side, online today.
chinayinliu.com against…
chinayinliu.com vs swiftsmmpanel.com: questions and answers
Answers about chinayinliu.com vs swiftsmmpanel.com from what we measured: the order counter, the price list, the registries and the review platforms. Facts last read October 15, 2026.
chinayinliu.com and swiftsmmpanel.com both score 50 of 100 on the Trust Score. chinayinliu.com is the older of the two, online since 2022; swiftsmmpanel.com since 2024. chinayinliu.com lists 721 services from $0.01 per 1,000, swiftsmmpanel.com 3,434 from $0.0006. On the 8 services both sell, swiftsmmpanel.com is cheaper on 8. chinayinliu.com's public counter stands at 555M orders (about 51,838 a day (+1,555,131 over 30 days)), swiftsmmpanel.com's at 300K (about 1,756 a day (+52,694 over 30 days)). Neither has reviews on the platforms we read. chinayinliu.com's owner has verified the listing on smm.guide; swiftsmmpanel.com is unclaimed. Of the 5 measures compared, chinayinliu.com leads 3 and swiftsmmpanel.com 2. Whichever you choose, start with a small order.
Comparing the lowest public rate per 1,000 on the services both sell — Instagram followers: $4.66 on chinayinliu.com against $0.169 on swiftsmmpanel.com; Instagram likes: $0.37 on chinayinliu.com against $0.043 on swiftsmmpanel.com; Instagram views: $0.08 on chinayinliu.com against $0.0007 on swiftsmmpanel.com; Instagram comments: $18.19 on chinayinliu.com against $0.468 on swiftsmmpanel.com. swiftsmmpanel.com is cheaper on 8 of the 8; the cheapest offer on any service is not always the fastest or the most stable, so check refill and drop on each listing.
chinayinliu.com since 2022, 555M orders on its counter; swiftsmmpanel.com since 2024, 300K orders on its counter. Age comes from the registry record or the web archive and counts towards the Trust Score; a counter that keeps moving counts more than a large frozen one.
chinayinliu.com: owner verified, no reviews read, Trust Score 50. swiftsmmpanel.com: unclaimed, no reviews read, Trust Score 50. chinayinliu.com has the stronger evidence behind it, and neither figure is a guarantee: start with a small order, check the delivery, and read the reviews behind each rating on the listing.