cheapestpanel.com vs prm4u.com
Two SMM panels side by side, on the figures we measure — age from the registries, the public price list, the order counter, reviews on named platforms — not on what either says about itself. Updated October 27, 2026.
| 2 panels |
67/ 100 · Solid
|
83/ 100 · Strong
|
|---|---|---|
| Online since | 2017 | 2020 |
| Engine | Perfect Panel | Perfect Panel |
| Services listed | 82 | 1,835 |
| Lowest price | $0.0015 per 1,000 | $0.0009 per 1,000 |
| Order counter | 650,657 orders | 34,283,357 orders |
| Growth, 30 days | about 53 a day (+1,589 over 30 days) | about 17,784 a day (+533,518 over 30 days) |
| User rating | no reviews read | 4.7 of 5 · 79 reviews |
| Review platforms | — | Top Business Software, Product Hunt, RealReviews, Sitejabber |
| Owner | verified | verified · TrustPanel |
| Reseller API | yes · /api/v2 | yes · /api/v2 |
| Payment methods | unknown | Visa / Mastercard, USDT / BTC / ETH, Binance Pay, Cryptomus, Heleket, Alipay, UPI, Paytm, Bank transfer |
| Status | online | online |
Prices on shared services
The lowest public rate per 1,000 on services at least two of these panels sell. The cheapest is not always the fastest: refill and drop are on each listing.
Cheapest across 12 rows: prm4u.com 7 · cheapestpanel.com 5
| Service |  cheapestpanel.com |  prm4u.com |
|---|---|---|
| Instagram views | $0.0015 | $0.0018 |
| TikTok followers | $1.13 | $2.70 |
| TikTok likes | $0.313 | $0.27 |
| TikTok views | $0.0063 | $0.036 |
| TikTok comments | $0.813 | $4.50 |
| YouTube likes | $0.29 | $0.405 |
| YouTube views | $0.619 | $0.36 |
| Telegram likes | $0.063 | $0.009 |
| Telegram views | $0.05 | $0.0009 |
| Telegram members | $3.65 | $0.09 |
| Telegram comments | $3.75 | $0.90 |
| Telegram shares | $0.10 | $0.018 |
| Facebook likes | $0.675 | $0.45 |
| Facebook views | $0.563 | $0.09 |
| Audiomack views | $0.50 | $0.54 |
Other comparisons
The nearest panels on the Trust Score to each side, online today.
cheapestpanel.com vs prm4u.com: questions and answers
Answers about cheapestpanel.com vs prm4u.com from what we measured: the order counter, the price list, the registries and the review platforms. Facts last read October 27, 2026.
prm4u.com scores 83 of 100 on the Trust Score, cheapestpanel.com 67 — a 16-point gap. cheapestpanel.com is the older of the two, online since 2017; prm4u.com since 2020. cheapestpanel.com lists 82 services from $0.0015 per 1,000, prm4u.com 1,835 from $0.0009. On the 8 services both sell, cheapestpanel.com is cheaper on 5. cheapestpanel.com's public counter stands at 651K orders (about 53 a day (+1,589 over 30 days)), prm4u.com's at 34M (about 17,784 a day (+533,518 over 30 days)). prm4u.com is rated 4.7 of 5 across 79 reviews on the platforms we read; we found no reviews of cheapestpanel.com there. Both owners have verified their listings on smm.guide. Of the 7 measures compared, prm4u.com leads 5 and cheapestpanel.com 2. Whichever you choose, start with a small order.
Comparing the lowest public rate per 1,000 on the services both sell — Instagram views: $0.0015 on cheapestpanel.com against $0.0018 on prm4u.com; TikTok followers: $1.13 on cheapestpanel.com against $2.70 on prm4u.com; TikTok likes: $0.313 on cheapestpanel.com against $0.27 on prm4u.com; TikTok views: $0.0063 on cheapestpanel.com against $0.036 on prm4u.com. cheapestpanel.com is cheaper on 5 of the 8; the cheapest offer on any service is not always the fastest or the most stable, so check refill and drop on each listing.
cheapestpanel.com since 2017, 651K orders on its counter; prm4u.com since 2020, 34M orders on its counter. Age comes from the registry record or the web archive and counts towards the Trust Score; a counter that keeps moving counts more than a large frozen one.
cheapestpanel.com: owner verified, no reviews read, Trust Score 67. prm4u.com: owner verified, rated 4.7 across 79 reviews, Trust Score 83. prm4u.com has the stronger evidence behind it, and neither figure is a guarantee: start with a small order, check the delivery, and read the reviews behind each rating on the listing.