cheapestindiansmm.com vs fontesmm.com
Two SMM panels side by side, on the figures we measure — age from the registries, the public price list, the order counter, reviews on named platforms — not on what either says about itself. Updated October 31, 2026.
| 2 panels |
51/ 100 · Fair
|
51/ 100 · Fair
|
|---|---|---|
| Online since | 2022 | 2023 |
| Engine | Perfect Panel | Perfect Panel |
| Services listed | 698 | 313 |
| Lowest price | $0.0005 per 1,000 | $0.0075 per 1,000 |
| Order counter | 9,000,000 orders | 259,691 orders |
| Growth, 30 days | no growth read | about 67 a day (+2,018 over 30 days) |
| User rating | no reviews read | no reviews read |
| Review platforms | — | — |
| Owner | unclaimed | unclaimed |
| Reseller API | yes · /api/v2 | yes · /api/v2 |
| Status | online | online |
Prices on shared services
The lowest public rate per 1,000 on services at least two of these panels sell. The cheapest is not always the fastest: refill and drop are on each listing.
Cheapest across 12 rows: cheapestindiansmm.com 10 · fontesmm.com 2
| Service |  cheapestindiansmm.com |  fontesmm.com |
|---|---|---|
| Instagram followers | $0.56 | $0.878 |
| Instagram likes | $0.078 | $0.201 |
| Instagram views | $0.001 | $0.0093 |
| Instagram comments | $0.439 | $22.05 |
| Instagram shares | $0.0005 | $0.069 |
| TikTok followers | $1.04 | $2.12 |
| TikTok likes | $0.301 | $0.084 |
| TikTok views | $0.0088 | $0.231 |
| YouTube likes | $0.509 | $1.22 |
| YouTube views | $0.43 | $0.992 |
| YouTube subscribers | $19.60 | $3.65 |
| YouTube comments | $3.11 | $6.06 |
| Telegram views | $0.0013 | $0.0075 |
| Telegram members | $0.048 | $0.873 |
| Facebook followers | $0.178 | $0.983 |
| Facebook likes | $0.30 | $1.55 |
| Facebook views | $0.04 | $0.235 |
| Facebook comments | $0.571 | $5.96 |
| Twitter / X views | $0.0017 | $0.019 |
| Other likes | $0.043 | $0.252 |
| Other views | $0.002 | $7.01 |
| WhatsApp members | $2.51 | $4.76 |
Other comparisons
The nearest panels on the Trust Score to each side, online today.
cheapestindiansmm.com against…
cheapestindiansmm.com vs fontesmm.com: questions and answers
Answers about cheapestindiansmm.com vs fontesmm.com from what we measured: the order counter, the price list, the registries and the review platforms. Facts last read October 31, 2026.
cheapestindiansmm.com and fontesmm.com both score 51 of 100 on the Trust Score. cheapestindiansmm.com is the older of the two, online since 2022; fontesmm.com since 2023. cheapestindiansmm.com lists 698 services from $0.0005 per 1,000, fontesmm.com 313 from $0.0075. On the 8 services both sell, cheapestindiansmm.com is cheaper on 7. cheapestindiansmm.com's public counter stands at 9M orders, fontesmm.com's at 260K (about 67 a day (+2,018 over 30 days)). Neither has reviews on the platforms we read. Of the 5 measures compared, cheapestindiansmm.com leads 4 and fontesmm.com 1. Whichever you choose, start with a small order.
Comparing the lowest public rate per 1,000 on the services both sell — Instagram followers: $0.56 on cheapestindiansmm.com against $0.878 on fontesmm.com; Instagram likes: $0.078 on cheapestindiansmm.com against $0.201 on fontesmm.com; Instagram views: $0.001 on cheapestindiansmm.com against $0.0093 on fontesmm.com; Instagram comments: $0.439 on cheapestindiansmm.com against $22.05 on fontesmm.com. cheapestindiansmm.com is cheaper on 7 of the 8; the cheapest offer on any service is not always the fastest or the most stable, so check refill and drop on each listing.
cheapestindiansmm.com since 2022, 9M orders on its counter; fontesmm.com since 2023, 260K orders on its counter. Age comes from the registry record or the web archive and counts towards the Trust Score; a counter that keeps moving counts more than a large frozen one.
cheapestindiansmm.com: unclaimed, no reviews read, Trust Score 51. fontesmm.com: unclaimed, no reviews read, Trust Score 51. cheapestindiansmm.com has the stronger evidence behind it, and neither figure is a guarantee: start with a small order, check the delivery, and read the reviews behind each rating on the listing.