bestsmmpanel.in vs blacksmmraja.com
Two SMM panels side by side, on the figures we measure — age from the registries, the public price list, the order counter, reviews on named platforms — not on what either says about itself. Updated October 30, 2026.
| 2 panels |
44/ 100 · Fair
|
44/ 100 · Fair
|
|---|---|---|
| Online since | 2022 | 2024 |
| Engine | Perfect Panel | Perfect Panel |
| Services listed | 1,269 | 352 |
| Lowest price | $0.0046 per 1,000 | $0.0019 per 1,000 |
| Order counter | not shown | 64,538 orders |
| Growth, 30 days | — | no growth read |
| User rating | no reviews read | 4.5 of 5 · 7 reviews |
| Review platforms | — | Trustpilot |
| Owner | unclaimed | unclaimed |
| Reseller API | yes · /api/v2 | yes · /api/v2 |
| Status | online | online |
Prices on shared services
The lowest public rate per 1,000 on services at least two of these panels sell. The cheapest is not always the fastest: refill and drop are on each listing.
Cheapest across 12 rows: blacksmmraja.com 7 · bestsmmpanel.in 5
| Service |  bestsmmpanel.in |  blacksmmraja.com |
|---|---|---|
| Instagram followers | $0.315 | $0.252 |
| Instagram likes | $0.147 | $0.087 |
| Instagram views | $0.0046 | $0.0092 |
| Instagram comments | $1.26 | $1.45 |
| TikTok followers | $12.37 | $3.07 |
| TikTok likes | $2.37 | $0.346 |
| TikTok views | $0.04 | $0.041 |
| YouTube likes | $1.73 | $0.918 |
| YouTube views | $0.901 | $1.40 |
| YouTube comments | $25.17 | $6.65 |
| Telegram likes | $0.14 | $0.054 |
| Telegram views | $0.037 | $0.054 |
| Telegram members | $0.876 | $0.986 |
| Facebook followers | $0.48 | $0.611 |
| Facebook likes | $0.352 | $0.316 |
| Twitter / X likes | $6.77 | $1.64 |
| LinkedIn likes | $43.03 | $38.17 |
| Pinterest followers | $45.11 | $7.31 |
| Bluesky followers | $57.55 | $3.50 |
| Other likes | $2.24 | $0.592 |
| Bluesky likes | $57.55 | $2.82 |
| WhatsApp members | $25.02 | $2.94 |
| Bluesky shares | $57.55 | $2.96 |
Other comparisons
The nearest panels on the Trust Score to each side, online today.
bestsmmpanel.in against…
bestsmmpanel.in vs blacksmmraja.com: questions and answers
Answers about bestsmmpanel.in vs blacksmmraja.com from what we measured: the order counter, the price list, the registries and the review platforms. Facts last read October 30, 2026.
bestsmmpanel.in and blacksmmraja.com both score 44 of 100 on the Trust Score. bestsmmpanel.in is the older of the two, online since 2022; blacksmmraja.com since 2024. bestsmmpanel.in lists 1,269 services from $0.0046 per 1,000, blacksmmraja.com 352 from $0.0019. On the 8 services both sell, blacksmmraja.com is cheaper on 5. blacksmmraja.com shows a public counter — 65K orders — while bestsmmpanel.in shows none. blacksmmraja.com is rated 4.5 of 5 across 7 reviews on the platforms we read; we found no reviews of bestsmmpanel.in there. Of the 5 measures compared, blacksmmraja.com leads 3 and bestsmmpanel.in 2. Whichever you choose, start with a small order.
Comparing the lowest public rate per 1,000 on the services both sell — Instagram followers: $0.315 on bestsmmpanel.in against $0.252 on blacksmmraja.com; Instagram likes: $0.147 on bestsmmpanel.in against $0.087 on blacksmmraja.com; Instagram views: $0.0046 on bestsmmpanel.in against $0.0092 on blacksmmraja.com; Instagram comments: $1.26 on bestsmmpanel.in against $1.45 on blacksmmraja.com. blacksmmraja.com is cheaper on 5 of the 8; the cheapest offer on any service is not always the fastest or the most stable, so check refill and drop on each listing.
bestsmmpanel.in since 2022, no public counter; blacksmmraja.com since 2024, 65K orders on its counter. Age comes from the registry record or the web archive and counts towards the Trust Score; a counter that keeps moving counts more than a large frozen one.
bestsmmpanel.in: unclaimed, no reviews read, Trust Score 44. blacksmmraja.com: unclaimed, rated 4.5 across 7 reviews, Trust Score 44. blacksmmraja.com has the stronger evidence behind it, and neither figure is a guarantee: start with a small order, check the delivery, and read the reviews behind each rating on the listing.