attpanel.com vs soc-proof.su
Two SMM panels side by side, on the figures we measure — age from the registries, the public price list, the order counter, reviews on named platforms — not on what either says about itself. Updated September 22, 2026.
| 2 panels |
44/ 100 · Fair
|
47/ 100 · Fair
|
|---|---|---|
| Online since | 2022 | 2014 |
| Engine | SMM (Other/Custom) | Perfect Panel |
| Services listed | 1,654 | 1,320 |
| Lowest price | $0.001 per 1,000 | $0.0024 per 1,000 |
| Order counter | not shown | 202,998,248 orders |
| Growth, 30 days | — | about 182,763 a day (+913,815 over 5 days) |
| User rating | 2.9 of 5 · 4 reviews | no reviews read |
| Review platforms | Trustpilot | — |
| Owner | unclaimed | unclaimed |
| Reseller API | not confirmed | yes · /api/v2 |
| Status | online | online |
Prices on shared services
The lowest public rate per 1,000 on services at least two of these panels sell. Cheapest is not always fastest — refill and drop stand on each listing.
Cheapest across 12 rows: attpanel.com 7 · soc-proof.su 5
| Service | ||
|---|---|---|
| Instagram followers | $0.567 | $2.79 |
| Instagram likes | $0.066 | $0.095 |
| Instagram views | $0.0011 | $0.0032 |
| Instagram comments | $0.715 | $0.834 |
| Instagram shares | $0.096 | $0.024 |
| TikTok followers | $0.638 | $4.10 |
| TikTok likes | $0.058 | $0.238 |
| TikTok views | $0.021 | $0.03 |
| TikTok comments | $5.62 | $1.02 |
| TikTok shares | $0.05 | $0.024 |
| YouTube likes | $0.448 | $0.298 |
| YouTube views | $0.67 | $0.286 |
| YouTube subscribers | $19.06 | $43.84 |
| YouTube comments | $1.19 | $2.20 |
| Telegram likes | $0.0092 | $0.011 |
| Telegram views | $0.0016 | $0.006 |
| Telegram members | $0.45 | $0.029 |
| Telegram comments | $1.58 | $1.89 |
| Telegram shares | $0.051 | $0.036 |
| Facebook followers | $0.121 | $0.429 |
| Facebook likes | $0.085 | $0.119 |
| Facebook shares | $0.035 | $1.55 |
| Twitter / X followers | $0.90 | $1.10 |
| Twitter / X likes | $0.627 | $1.13 |
Other comparisons
The nearest panels on the Trust Score to each side, online today.
attpanel.com against…
attpanel.com vs soc-proof.su: questions and answers
Straight answers about attpanel.com vs soc-proof.su, built from what we measured — the counter, the price list, the registries and the review platforms. Facts last read September 22, 2026.
soc-proof.su scores 47 of 100 on the Trust Score, attpanel.com 44 — a 3-point gap. soc-proof.su is the older of the two, online since 2014; attpanel.com since 2022. attpanel.com lists 1,654 services from $0.001 per 1,000, soc-proof.su 1,320 from $0.0024. On the 8 services both sell, attpanel.com is cheaper on 7. soc-proof.su shows a public counter — 203M orders, about 182,763 a day (+913,815 over 5 days) — while attpanel.com shows none. attpanel.com is rated 2.9 of 5 across 4 reviews on the platforms we read; we found no reviews of soc-proof.su there. Of the 7 measures compared, soc-proof.su leads 4 and attpanel.com 3. Whichever you choose, start with a small order.
Comparing the lowest public rate per 1,000 on the services both sell — Instagram followers: $0.567 on attpanel.com against $2.79 on soc-proof.su; Instagram likes: $0.066 on attpanel.com against $0.095 on soc-proof.su; Instagram views: $0.0011 on attpanel.com against $0.0032 on soc-proof.su; Instagram comments: $0.715 on attpanel.com against $0.834 on soc-proof.su. attpanel.com is cheaper on 7 of the 8; the cheapest offer on any service is not always the fastest or the most stable, so check refill and drop on each listing.
attpanel.com since 2022, no public counter; soc-proof.su since 2014, 203M orders on its counter. Age comes from the registry record or the web archive and counts towards the Trust Score; a counter that keeps moving counts more than a large frozen one.
attpanel.com: unclaimed, rated 2.9 across 4 reviews, Trust Score 44. soc-proof.su: unclaimed, no reviews read, Trust Score 47. soc-proof.su has the stronger evidence behind it, and neither figure is a guarantee: start with a small order, check the delivery, and read the reviews behind each rating on the listing.