atommedya.com vs smmfansfaster.com
Two SMM panels side by side, on the figures we measure — age from the registries, the public price list, the order counter, reviews on named platforms — not on what either says about itself. Updated September 18, 2026.
| 2 panels |
49/ 100 · Fair
|
49/ 100 · Fair
|
|---|---|---|
| Online since | 2019 | 2018 |
| Engine | Perfect Panel | Perfect Panel |
| Services listed | 268 | 3,631 |
| Lowest price | $0.0008 per 1,000 | $0.001 per 1,000 |
| Order counter | not shown | not shown |
| Growth, 30 days | — | — |
| User rating | no reviews read | 2.3 of 5 · 10 reviews |
| Review platforms | — | Reviews.io, Sitejabber |
| Owner | unclaimed | unclaimed |
| Reseller API | yes · /api/v2 | yes · /api/v2 |
| Status | online | online |
Prices on shared services
The lowest public rate per 1,000 on services at least two of these panels sell. Cheapest is not always fastest — refill and drop stand on each listing.
Cheapest across 12 rows: smmfansfaster.com 7 · atommedya.com 5
| Service |  atommedya.com |  smmfansfaster.com |
|---|---|---|
| Instagram followers | $0.272 | $0.212 |
| Instagram likes | $0.026 | $0.011 |
| Instagram views | $0.0008 | $0.0013 |
| Instagram comments | $0.625 | $0.39 |
| Instagram shares | $0.507 | $0.0013 |
| TikTok followers | $1.12 | $0.933 |
| TikTok likes | $0.012 | $0.018 |
| TikTok views | $0.0078 | $0.0035 |
| TikTok comments | $0.736 | $1.50 |
| TikTok shares | $0.106 | $0.057 |
| YouTube likes | $0.30 | $0.345 |
| YouTube subscribers | $0.018 | $18.98 |
| YouTube comments | $1.62 | $1.49 |
| Telegram views | $0.0028 | $0.03 |
| Telegram members | $0.179 | $0.20 |
| Facebook followers | $0.188 | $0.137 |
| Facebook likes | $0.098 | $0.109 |
| Facebook views | $0.031 | $0.022 |
| Facebook members | $0.25 | $0.431 |
| Twitter / X followers | $0.69 | $1.12 |
| Twitter / X likes | $0.729 | $0.484 |
| Twitter / X views | $0.0008 | $0.001 |
| Twitter / X comments | $12.00 | $15.00 |
| Twitter / X shares | $0.35 | $0.125 |
| Spotify followers | $0.301 | $0.127 |
| Twitch followers | $0.116 | $0.517 |
Other comparisons
The nearest panels on the Trust Score to each side, online today.
atommedya.com vs smmfansfaster.com: questions and answers
Straight answers about atommedya.com vs smmfansfaster.com, built from what we measured — the counter, the price list, the registries and the review platforms. Facts last read September 18, 2026.
atommedya.com and smmfansfaster.com both score 49 of 100 on the Trust Score. smmfansfaster.com is the older of the two, online since 2018; atommedya.com since 2019. atommedya.com lists 268 services from $0.0008 per 1,000, smmfansfaster.com 3,631 from $0.001. On the 8 services both sell, smmfansfaster.com is cheaper on 6. smmfansfaster.com is rated 2.3 of 5 across 10 reviews on the platforms we read; we found no reviews of atommedya.com there. Of the 4 measures compared, smmfansfaster.com leads 4. Whichever you choose, start with a small order.
Comparing the lowest public rate per 1,000 on the services both sell — Instagram followers: $0.272 on atommedya.com against $0.212 on smmfansfaster.com; Instagram likes: $0.026 on atommedya.com against $0.011 on smmfansfaster.com; Instagram views: $0.0008 on atommedya.com against $0.0013 on smmfansfaster.com; Instagram comments: $0.625 on atommedya.com against $0.39 on smmfansfaster.com. smmfansfaster.com is cheaper on 6 of the 8; the cheapest offer on any service is not always the fastest or the most stable, so check refill and drop on each listing.
atommedya.com since 2019, no public counter; smmfansfaster.com since 2018, no public counter. Age comes from the registry record or the web archive and counts towards the Trust Score; a counter that keeps moving counts more than a large frozen one.
atommedya.com: unclaimed, no reviews read, Trust Score 49. smmfansfaster.com: unclaimed, rated 2.3 across 10 reviews, Trust Score 49. smmfansfaster.com has the stronger evidence behind it, and neither figure is a guarantee: start with a small order, check the delivery, and read the reviews behind each rating on the listing.