app.pigolikes.com vs zosmm.com
Two SMM panels side by side, on the figures we measure — age from the registries, the public price list, the order counter, reviews on named platforms — not on what either says about itself. Updated November 4, 2026.
| 2 panels |
56/ 100 · Fair
|
56/ 100 · Fair
|
|---|---|---|
| Online since | 2021 | 2021 |
| Engine | Perfect Panel | Perfect Panel |
| Services listed | 531 | 1,751 |
| Lowest price | $0.002 per 1,000 | $0.0014 per 1,000 |
| Order counter | not shown | not shown |
| Growth, 30 days | — | — |
| User rating | 4.2 of 5 · 95 reviews | 4.7 of 5 · 6 reviews |
| Review platforms | Trustpilot, RatingFacts | RatingFacts, Sitejabber, Trustpilot |
| Owner | unclaimed | verified |
| Reseller API | yes · /api/v2 | yes · /api/v2 |
| Payment methods | unknown | USDT / BTC / ETH, Cryptomus, Heleket, NOWPayments |
| Status | online | online |
Prices on shared services
The lowest public rate per 1,000 on services at least two of these panels sell. The cheapest is not always the fastest: refill and drop are on each listing.
Cheapest across 12 rows: zosmm.com 8 · app.pigolikes.com 4
| Service |  app.pigolikes.com |  zosmm.com |
|---|---|---|
| Instagram likes | $0.119 | $0.082 |
| Instagram views | $0.002 | $0.0014 |
| Instagram comments | $0.742 | $0.531 |
| Instagram shares | $0.017 | $0.0024 |
| TikTok likes | $0.091 | $0.24 |
| TikTok views | $0.0086 | $0.0067 |
| TikTok comments | $3.23 | $3.50 |
| TikTok shares | $0.06 | $0.14 |
| YouTube likes | $1.30 | $0.24 |
| YouTube views | $0.70 | $0.765 |
| YouTube comments | $3.00 | $1.80 |
| Telegram likes | $0.039 | $0.008 |
| Telegram views | $0.019 | $0.0022 |
| Telegram members | $0.819 | $0.05 |
| Telegram comments | $3.23 | $1.47 |
| Telegram shares | $0.059 | $0.015 |
| Facebook followers | $0.26 | $0.385 |
| Facebook likes | $0.158 | $0.171 |
| Facebook views | $0.046 | $0.03 |
| Facebook members | $0.407 | $0.706 |
| Twitter / X followers | $9.35 | $0.53 |
| Twitter / X likes | $0.795 | $1.84 |
| Twitter / X views | $0.006 | $0.0019 |
| Twitter / X shares | $1.49 | $0.15 |
| Threads followers | $10.34 | $0.64 |
Other comparisons
The nearest panels on the Trust Score to each side, online today.
app.pigolikes.com against…
app.pigolikes.com vs zosmm.com: questions and answers
Answers about app.pigolikes.com vs zosmm.com from what we measured: the order counter, the price list, the registries and the review platforms. Facts last read November 4, 2026.
app.pigolikes.com and zosmm.com both score 56 of 100 on the Trust Score. Both have been online since 2021. app.pigolikes.com lists 531 services from $0.002 per 1,000, zosmm.com 1,751 from $0.0014. On the 8 services both sell, zosmm.com is cheaper on 5. Users rate app.pigolikes.com 4.2 of 5 across 95 reviews, zosmm.com 4.7 across 6. zosmm.com's owner has verified the listing on smm.guide; app.pigolikes.com is unclaimed. Of the 3 measures compared, zosmm.com leads 3. Whichever you choose, start with a small order.
Comparing the lowest public rate per 1,000 on the services both sell — Instagram likes: $0.119 on app.pigolikes.com against $0.082 on zosmm.com; Instagram views: $0.002 on app.pigolikes.com against $0.0014 on zosmm.com; Instagram comments: $0.742 on app.pigolikes.com against $0.531 on zosmm.com; Instagram shares: $0.017 on app.pigolikes.com against $0.0024 on zosmm.com. zosmm.com is cheaper on 5 of the 8; the cheapest offer on any service is not always the fastest or the most stable, so check refill and drop on each listing.
app.pigolikes.com since 2021, no public counter; zosmm.com since 2021, no public counter. Age comes from the registry record or the web archive and counts towards the Trust Score; a counter that keeps moving counts more than a large frozen one.
app.pigolikes.com: unclaimed, rated 4.2 across 95 reviews, Trust Score 56. zosmm.com: owner verified, rated 4.7 across 6 reviews, Trust Score 56. zosmm.com has the stronger evidence behind it, and neither figure is a guarantee: start with a small order, check the delivery, and read the reviews behind each rating on the listing.