Home / Compare / apiseller.com vs luxplanb.com

apiseller.com vs luxplanb.com

Two SMM panels side by side, on the figures we measure — age from the registries, the public price list, the order counter, reviews on named platforms — not on what either says about itself. Updated September 8, 2026.

Trust Score
54 / 100 · Fair
55 / 100 · Fair
Online since
2019
2022
Engine
Perfect Panel
Perfect Panel
Services listed
4,222
1,948
Lowest price
$0.0011 per 1,000
$0.0018 per 1,000
Order counter
not shown
974,792,159 orders
Growth, 30 days
+689 orders in 26 days, about 27 a day
User rating
4.5 of 5 · 12 reviews
no reviews read
Review platforms
Trustpilot, Sitejabber
Owner
unclaimed
unclaimed
Reseller API
not detected
yes
Status
online
online
Open apiseller.com Open luxplanb.com the better figure of the two

Verdict

luxplanb.com scores 55 of 100 on the Trust Score, apiseller.com 54 — a 1-point gap. apiseller.com is the older of the two, online since 2019; luxplanb.com since 2022. apiseller.com lists 4,222 services from $0.0011 per 1,000, luxplanb.com 1,948 from $0.0018. On the 8 services both sell, luxplanb.com is cheaper on 5. luxplanb.com shows a public counter — 975M orders, +689 orders in 26 days, about 27 a day — while apiseller.com shows none. apiseller.com is rated 4.5 of 5 across 12 reviews on the platforms we read; we found no reviews of luxplanb.com there. luxplanb.com is the stronger pick on the figures, with apiseller.com close behind. Whichever you choose, start with a small order.

Prices on the services both sell

The lowest public rate per 1,000 for each service, in US dollars at the day's rate. Cheapest is not always fastest — refill and drop stand on each listing.

Service
apiseller.com
luxplanb.com
Instagram followers
$0.539
$0.251
Instagram likes
$0.042
$0.075
Instagram views
$0.0019
$0.0018
Instagram comments
$0.39
$0.201
Instagram shares
$0.016
$0.0081
TikTok followers
$1.16
$1.50
TikTok likes
$0.121
$0.165
TikTok views
$0.014
$0.0091

Other comparisons

The nearest panels on the Trust Score to each side, online today.

apiseller.com vs luxplanb.com: questions and answers

Straight answers about apiseller.com vs luxplanb.com, built from what we measured — the counter, the price list, the registries and the review platforms. Updated September 8, 2026.

luxplanb.com scores 55 of 100 on the Trust Score, apiseller.com 54 — a 1-point gap. apiseller.com is the older of the two, online since 2019; luxplanb.com since 2022. apiseller.com lists 4,222 services from $0.0011 per 1,000, luxplanb.com 1,948 from $0.0018. On the 8 services both sell, luxplanb.com is cheaper on 5. luxplanb.com shows a public counter — 975M orders, +689 orders in 26 days, about 27 a day — while apiseller.com shows none. apiseller.com is rated 4.5 of 5 across 12 reviews on the platforms we read; we found no reviews of luxplanb.com there. luxplanb.com is the stronger pick on the figures, with apiseller.com close behind. Whichever you choose, start with a small order.

Comparing the lowest public rate per 1,000 on the services both sell — Instagram followers: $0.539 on apiseller.com against $0.251 on luxplanb.com; Instagram likes: $0.042 on apiseller.com against $0.075 on luxplanb.com; Instagram views: $0.0019 on apiseller.com against $0.0018 on luxplanb.com; Instagram comments: $0.39 on apiseller.com against $0.201 on luxplanb.com. luxplanb.com is cheaper on 5 of the 8; the cheapest offer on any service is not always the fastest or the most stable, so check refill and drop on each listing.

apiseller.com since 2019, no public counter; luxplanb.com since 2022, 975M orders on its counter. Age comes from the registry record or the web archive and counts towards the Trust Score; a counter that keeps moving counts more than a large frozen one.

apiseller.com: unclaimed, rated 4.5 across 12 reviews, Trust Score 54. luxplanb.com: unclaimed, no reviews read, Trust Score 55. luxplanb.com has the stronger evidence behind it, and neither figure is a guarantee: start with a small order, check the delivery, and read the reviews behind each rating on the listing.