anamazingheaven.com vs fastersmm.com
Two SMM panels side by side, on the figures we measure — age from the registries, the public price list, the order counter, reviews on named platforms — not on what either says about itself. Updated October 6, 2026.
| 2 panels |
49/ 100 · Fair
|
49/ 100 · Fair
|
|---|---|---|
| Online since | 2018 | 2020 |
| Engine | Perfect Panel | Perfect Panel |
| Services listed | 388 | 4,847 |
| Lowest price | $0.02 per 1,000 | $0.0004 per 1,000 |
| Order counter | not shown | 24,521,658 orders |
| Growth, 30 days | — | about 12,151 a day (+364,521 over 30 days) |
| User rating | no reviews read | no reviews read |
| Review platforms | — | — |
| Owner | unclaimed | unclaimed |
| Reseller API | yes · /api/v2 | yes · /api/v2 |
| Status | online | online |
Prices on shared services
The lowest public rate per 1,000 on services at least two of these panels sell. The cheapest is not always the fastest: refill and drop are on each listing.
Cheapest across 12 rows: fastersmm.com 12
| Service |  anamazingheaven.com |  fastersmm.com |
|---|---|---|
| Instagram followers | $4.62 | $0.286 |
| Instagram likes | $0.12 | $0.03 |
| Instagram views | $0.03 | $0.0004 |
| Instagram comments | $7.50 | $0.46 |
| Instagram shares | $0.26 | $0.0005 |
| TikTok followers | $9.00 | $0.816 |
| TikTok likes | $0.18 | $0.012 |
| TikTok views | $0.02 | $0.0026 |
| TikTok comments | $15.00 | $0.218 |
| TikTok shares | $0.39 | $0.012 |
| YouTube likes | $0.66 | $0.147 |
| YouTube views | $0.99 | $0.209 |
| YouTube subscribers | $63.94 | $0.225 |
| YouTube comments | $7.92 | $1.24 |
| Telegram members | $0.32 | $0.033 |
| Facebook followers | $1.63 | $0.104 |
| Facebook likes | $1.11 | $0.08 |
| Facebook views | $0.05 | $0.021 |
| Facebook comments | $109.38 | $1.80 |
| Twitter / X followers | $1.87 | $0.65 |
| Twitter / X views | $0.15 | $0.001 |
| Twitter / X shares | $0.15 | $0.208 |
| Spotify followers | $1.20 | $0.249 |
| Threads followers | $2.16 | $1.33 |
Other comparisons
The nearest panels on the Trust Score to each side, online today.
anamazingheaven.com against…
anamazingheaven.com vs fastersmm.com: questions and answers
Answers about anamazingheaven.com vs fastersmm.com from what we measured: the order counter, the price list, the registries and the review platforms. Facts last read October 6, 2026.
anamazingheaven.com and fastersmm.com both score 49 of 100 on the Trust Score. anamazingheaven.com is the older of the two, online since 2018; fastersmm.com since 2020. anamazingheaven.com lists 388 services from $0.02 per 1,000, fastersmm.com 4,847 from $0.0004. On the 8 services both sell, fastersmm.com is cheaper on 8. fastersmm.com shows a public counter — 25M orders, about 12,151 a day (+364,521 over 30 days) — while anamazingheaven.com shows none. Neither has reviews on the platforms we read. Of the 5 measures compared, fastersmm.com leads 4 and anamazingheaven.com 1. Whichever you choose, start with a small order.
Comparing the lowest public rate per 1,000 on the services both sell — Instagram followers: $4.62 on anamazingheaven.com against $0.286 on fastersmm.com; Instagram likes: $0.12 on anamazingheaven.com against $0.03 on fastersmm.com; Instagram views: $0.03 on anamazingheaven.com against $0.0004 on fastersmm.com; Instagram comments: $7.50 on anamazingheaven.com against $0.46 on fastersmm.com. fastersmm.com is cheaper on 8 of the 8; the cheapest offer on any service is not always the fastest or the most stable, so check refill and drop on each listing.
anamazingheaven.com since 2018, no public counter; fastersmm.com since 2020, 25M orders on its counter. Age comes from the registry record or the web archive and counts towards the Trust Score; a counter that keeps moving counts more than a large frozen one.
anamazingheaven.com: unclaimed, no reviews read, Trust Score 49. fastersmm.com: unclaimed, no reviews read, Trust Score 49. fastersmm.com has the stronger evidence behind it, and neither figure is a guarantee: start with a small order, check the delivery, and read the reviews behind each rating on the listing.