ig panel vs ytlikes.com
Two SMM panels side by side, on the figures we measure — age from the registries, the public price list, the order counter, reviews on named platforms — not on what either says about itself. Updated September 28, 2026.
| 2 panels |
33/ 100 · Guarded
|
40/ 100 · Guarded
|
|---|---|---|
| Online since | 2021 | 2023 |
| Engine | Perfect Panel | Perfect Panel |
| Services listed | 5,558 | 6,462 |
| Lowest price | $0.55 per 1,000 | $0.0005 per 1,000 |
| Order counter | not shown | 8,583,865 orders |
| Growth, 30 days | — | about 15,580 a day (+467,394 over 30 days) |
| User rating | no reviews read | 2.9 of 5 · 2 reviews |
| Review platforms | — | Trustpilot |
| Owner | unclaimed | unclaimed |
| Reseller API | yes · /api/v2 | yes · /api/v2 |
| Status | online | online |
Prices on shared services
The lowest public rate per 1,000 on services at least two of these panels sell. The cheapest is not always the fastest: refill and drop are on each listing.
Cheapest across 12 rows: ytlikes.com 12
| Service |  ig panel |  ytlikes.com |
|---|---|---|
| Instagram followers | $2.24 | $0.45 |
| Instagram likes | $2.00 | $0.0096 |
| Instagram views | $2.01 | $0.0013 |
| Instagram comments | $2.58 | $0.30 |
| TikTok followers | $3.44 | $0.884 |
| TikTok likes | $1.02 | $0.093 |
| TikTok views | $1.20 | $0.012 |
| TikTok comments | $2.88 | $0.825 |
| YouTube likes | $2.19 | $0.25 |
| YouTube views | $2.30 | $0.206 |
| YouTube subscribers | $20.53 | $0.01 |
| YouTube comments | $3.76 | $2.47 |
| YouTube shares | $2.25 | $0.246 |
| Telegram likes | $2.02 | $0.0077 |
| Telegram views | $2.01 | $0.002 |
| Telegram members | $2.02 | $0.039 |
| Facebook followers | $2.14 | $0.096 |
| Facebook likes | $2.12 | $0.074 |
| Facebook views | $2.11 | $0.02 |
| Facebook comments | $11.88 | $2.15 |
| Twitter / X followers | $2.54 | $0.75 |
| Twitter / X likes | $2.85 | $0.80 |
| Twitter / X views | $2.01 | $0.0019 |
| Twitter / X comments | $17.77 | $40.89 |
| Twitter / X shares | $0.55 | $2.57 |
| Deezer followers | $2.54 | $0.625 |
| Reddit comments | $39.07 | $6.60 |
Other comparisons
The nearest panels on the Trust Score to each side, online today.
ig panel vs ytlikes.com: questions and answers
Answers about ig panel vs ytlikes.com from what we measured: the order counter, the price list, the registries and the review platforms. Facts last read September 28, 2026.
ytlikes.com scores 40 of 100 on the Trust Score, ig panel 33 — a 7-point gap. ig panel is the older of the two, online since 2021; ytlikes.com since 2023. ig panel lists 5,558 services from $0.55 per 1,000, ytlikes.com 6,462 from $0.0005. On the 8 services both sell, ytlikes.com is cheaper on 8. ytlikes.com shows a public counter — 8.6M orders, about 15,580 a day (+467,394 over 30 days) — while ig panel shows none. ytlikes.com is rated 2.9 of 5 across 2 reviews on the platforms we read; we found no reviews of ig panel there. Of the 7 measures compared, ytlikes.com leads 6 and ig panel 1. Whichever you choose, start with a small order.
Comparing the lowest public rate per 1,000 on the services both sell — Instagram followers: $2.24 on ig panel against $0.45 on ytlikes.com; Instagram likes: $2.00 on ig panel against $0.0096 on ytlikes.com; Instagram views: $2.01 on ig panel against $0.0013 on ytlikes.com; Instagram comments: $2.58 on ig panel against $0.30 on ytlikes.com. ytlikes.com is cheaper on 8 of the 8; the cheapest offer on any service is not always the fastest or the most stable, so check refill and drop on each listing.
ig panel since 2021, no public counter; ytlikes.com since 2023, 8.6M orders on its counter. Age comes from the registry record or the web archive and counts towards the Trust Score; a counter that keeps moving counts more than a large frozen one.
ig panel: unclaimed, no reviews read, Trust Score 33. ytlikes.com: unclaimed, rated 2.9 across 2 reviews, Trust Score 40. ytlikes.com has the stronger evidence behind it, and neither figure is a guarantee: start with a small order, check the delivery, and read the reviews behind each rating on the listing.